SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ker) 3261

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
V.G. ARUN, J.
Sreenath M., s/o Gopinadhan – Appellant 
Versus 
University Of Calicut, Represented By Its Registrar – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 40468 OF 2025
Decided on : 10-12-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : SHRI.VIVEK.P.K SHRI.SANDEEP SUKUMARAN SMT.GADHA.S SRI.RENJITH RAJAPPAN
For the Respondent: SHRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN SRI.P.E.SAJAL SHRI.MUHAMMED HISHAM T. SMT.FATHIMA RINSHA T.P.

Existing members of the General Council lose eligibility to participate in Senate elections upon the election of new University Union Councillors, necessitating reconstitution of the General Council before elections.

Headnote:(A) Calicut University Act, 1975 - Section 18(3) and Calicut University (Conduct of Elections to Various Authorities or Bodies) First Statutes, 1975 - Validity of University Senate elections challenged - Determine eligibility of student members in General Council after new elections - Election for Senate should be conducted from the newly constituted General Council, as per the Constitution of the Calicut University Union. (Paras 2, 5, 7, 10, 12)

(B) Administrative Law - Writ jurisdiction - The court directed the university to reconstitute the General Council to include newly elected members. The delay in reconstitution of the Council affects the Senate elections. (Paras 10, 12).

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, elected as Union Councillor in 2025, contests the University’s decision to hold Senate elections from the outgoing General Council. Arguments raised refer to statutory provisions for election eligibility and the timeline of University elections.

Findings of Court:
The existing General Council members are deemed to have lost their membership with new elections; thus, the Senate election must proceed from the reconstituted General Council.

Issues: Whether existing student members of the General Council can participate in Senate elections post new elections of University Union Councillors.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that previous members of General Council cease membership upon new elections, thus ineligible to participate in subsequent electoral processes until the General Council is reconstituted.

Result: The writ petition is disposed, directing the reconstitution of the General Council to include elected members for 2025-2026.

Table of Content
1. arguments revolve around eligibility of council members. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. court examines terms regarding general council membership. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
3. court orders reconstitution of the general council. (Para 12)

JUDGMENT :

V.G.ARUN, J.

1. The petitioner, a 1st year BBA student of the KR'S Sree Narayana College, Valanchery, is elected as the University Union Councillor for the year 2025-2026, in the College Union Election conducted on 09.10.2025. The petitioner is aggrieved by the proposal of the Calicut University, to conduct election of the ten student members to the Senate of the University from among the members of the General Council of the University Union for the year 2024-2025. Hence this writ petition, seeking the following reliefs;

“(i) Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction, directing the respondents Nos. 1 to 3 not to proceed with the Senate election scheduled to be conducted on 06.11.2025 as per Exhibit P2, until the grievance raised by the petitioner regarding the eligibility of the members of the General Council of the University Union is duly considered and appropriate action is taken, in the interest of justice.

(ii) Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction, directing the respondents Nos. 1 to 3 to conduct the Senate election only from the members of the General Council of the University Union for the year 2025- 2026, including the petitioner and all other duly elected members, in accordance with the provisions of the Calicut University Act , 1975, and the Constitution of the Calicut University Union.

(iii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writs, orders or directions directing the 2nd and 3rd respondent to consider the ExhibitP5 and ExhibitP6 representations within a time frame stipulated by this Hon’ble Court.”

2. Adv.P.K.Vivek, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that the proposal of the University to conduct election to the Senate from among the members of the General Council of the University Union 2024-2025, who were elected on 10.10.2024, in spite of the election of new members on 09.10.2025, is patently illegal and in contravention of Ext.P4, 'Constitution of the Calicut University Union'. In support of the argument, reference is made to the stipulation in Article VI of Ext.P4, that the General Council of the University Union should include the University Union Councillors of the College Unions of the affiliated colleges and the members will hold office for one year or till the date of next election for the College Union. It is contended that, by the next election for the College Union being concluded on 09.10.2025, the University Union Councillors elected in the previous academic year ceased to be members of the General Council. Being so, election to the Senate has to be conducted after re-constituting the General Council with the newly elected University Union Councillors and revising the electoral roll.

3. It is submitted that as per the 3rdproviso to Section 18 (3) of Chapter IV of the Calicut University Act , 1975, the term of the ten student members elected by the the General Council shall be one year from the date of the election or nomination as the case may be. The Senate of the Calicut University was reconstituted in the year 2023- 2024 and continued after the expiry of its tenure. Even after the election to the College Unions for the year 2024- 2025, no action was taken by the University to reconstitute the General Council till 27.06.2025. According to the counsel, issuance of Ext.P2 notification on 09.10.2025 for electing full time student members to the Senate from the General Council, the date on which a new set of University Union Councillors got elected and thereby became entitled to be included in the General Council, is nothing but a mala fide exercise of power.

4. Adv.P.C.Sasidharan, the learned standing counsel for the University, submits that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top