SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ker) 536

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K.NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ.
Rincy Rudiyard.M D/O.Manjula Rani – Appellant
Versus
Karthik E Binod s/o. Binod E Mohanan
WA NO. 1630 OF 2025
Decided on : 03-02-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : SHRI.S.ABHILASH SRI.K.SIJU SMT.ANJANA KANNATH
For the Respondent: SRI.T.T.MUHAMOOD SMT.AMMU CHARLES SHRI.K.S.PRENJITH KUMAR, SC, SRI.K.MANOJ CHANDRAN SRI.A.RENJIT SHRI.GOKUL R.NAIR SHRI.ANSALAM N.X. SHRI.VENUGOPAL C.
SRI.T.C KRISHNA, SENIOR PANEL COUNSEL

Provisional admissions in medical colleges must adhere strictly to established counseling protocols to safeguard merit in the admission process.

Headnote:(A) National Medical Commission Act, 2019 - Section 14 - Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 2023 - NEET admission process - The court addressed the legality of provisional admissions granted by medical colleges outside of the established counseling protocols. The 1st respondent was admitted based on an interim order without satisfying necessary parameters. The 4th respondent college admitted the student without proper authority, violating MCC regulations and leading to dual admissions for a single seat. (Paras 17, 20)

(B) Provisional Admissions - The admissions granted under such circumstances were deemed invalid, necessitating compliance with established guidelines to ensure merit-based access to medical education. (Paras 9, 18)

Facts of the case:
The 1st respondent aspirant applied for NEET UG-2024 but did not secure a seat despite available vacancies. He obtained a provisional admission through an interim court order. The college later admitted another student post-MCC’s direction to fill vacant seats after the admission portal was reopened.

Findings of Court:
The judgment of the learned Single Judge was set aside. The admission of the 1st respondent was invalidated as it contradicted established counseling regulations.

Issues: The main legal question was whether the provisional admission made under judicial directive was permissible when it violated regulations governing medical college admissions.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that all admissions must comply fully with statutory guidelines, reaffirming established judicial principle that merit must govern admission processes. The actions by the college and MCC were found negligent, yet invalidating the irregular admission was necessary to uphold the law.

Result: Writ appeals allowed; judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 19.05.2025 set aside.

Table of Content
1. background of writ appeals and admissions. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments regarding admissions process. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. court's observations on regulatory requirements. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 13 , 14 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
4. legal standards regarding admissions. (Para 12 , 15)
5. outcome of the appeals. (Para 21)

JUDGMENT :

Muralee Krishna, J.

1. The appellant in W.A.No.1630 of 2025 is the 4th respondent, and the appellant in W.A.No.2745 of 2025 is a third party to W.P.(C)No.43449 of 2024. Both the writ appeals are filed challenging the judgment dated 19.05.2025, passed by the learned Single Judge in that writ petition. The parties to these writ appeals are referred in their status as they are in W.A.No.2745 of 2025, unless otherwise stated.

2. The facts which led to the filing of the present writ appeals are as follows:

2.1. The 1st respondent herein-petitioner in W.P.(C)No.43449 of 2024 is an aspirant of a medical course and appeared for the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (‘NEET’ for short) UG-2024. He secured All India Rank of 881671 and category rank of 393675. Evidencing the same, he produced Ext.P1 NEET score card in the writ petition. He had registered for the online medical counselling hosted by the Medical Counselling Committee (‘MCC’, for short) by paying the required fees. Even though the MCC conducted four rounds of seat allocation and a special stray vacancy round open to all pre-registered candidates who have completed registration and payment of fees earlier and are not holding any seat, for filling the MBBS seats in the Country, the 1st respondent could not secure a seat. Alleging that some of the medical seats were still lying vacant and one such general quota seat is vacant at the 4th respondent college, which is deemed to be University, the 1st respondent approached this Court with the writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the MCC to take immediate steps to fill the vacant seat in the MBBS course at the 4th respondent college/deemed to be University and allot the same to the 1st respondent.

2.2. On 09.12.2024, when the writ petition came up for consideration, the learned Single Judge passed Annexure A/Annexure R4(f) interim order as under:

“It is submitted that in the special stray round for filling up last of the vacancy, a student was allotted seat, but he has not turned up and has later informed that he is not interested to join.

2. In view of the fact that a seat of MBBS is still vacant, there will be an interim order directing the respondents to admit the petitioner to the course forthwith, if the petitioner satisfies all other parameters.

Post on 15.01.2025.”

2.3. Subsequently, the appellant in W.A.No.1630 of 2025 - 5th respondent herein, who secured All India Rank of 334961 and 101254th rank in the category section, filed W.P.(C) No.44690 of 2024 seeking a direction to allot the available seat in the 4th respondent college to her.

2.4. On the basis of Annexure R4 (f)/Annexure A interim order dated 09.12.2024, passed by the learned Single Judge, the 4th respondent college admitted the 1st respondent in the one and only stray vacancy available in the College. Meanwhile, some of the medical colleges approached the Apex Court with miscellaneous applications in W.P.(C) No. 833 of 2024 with a prayer for direction to the admission authorities to conduct a stray /special counselling round for the seats remaining vacant in several colleges, even after the five rounds of counselling. Taking into consideration the peculiar facts and circumstances, and further that the precious medical seats should not go in waste, when the Country is facing acute shortage of doctors, the Apex Court inclined to extend the period of counselling by way of a last chance. Paragraphs 6 to 9 of the order of the Apex Court dated 20.12.2024 in W.P.(C)No.833 of 2024 in the matter of Era Lucknow Medical College and Hospital v. State of Uttar Pradesh rea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top