Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K.NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S.
Rincy Rudiyard.M D/O.Manjula Rani – Appellant
Versus
Karthik E Binod s/o. Binod E Mohanan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of writ appeals and admissions. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding admissions process. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's observations on regulatory requirements. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 13 , 14 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. legal standards regarding admissions. (Para 12 , 15) |
| 5. outcome of the appeals. (Para 21) |
JUDGMENT :
Muralee Krishna, J.
1. The appellant in W.A.No.1630 of 2025 is the 4th respondent, and the appellant in W.A.No.2745 of 2025 is a third party to W.P.(C)No.43449 of 2024. Both the writ appeals are filed challenging the judgment dated 19.05.2025, passed by the learned Single Judge in that writ petition. The parties to these writ appeals are referred in their status as they are in W.A.No.2745 of 2025, unless otherwise stated.
2. The facts which led to the filing of the present writ appeals are as follows:
2.1. The 1st respondent herein-petitioner in W.P.(C)No.43449 of 2024 is an aspirant of a medical course and appeared for the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (‘NEET’ for short) UG-2024. He secured All India Rank of 881671 and category rank of 393675. Evidencing the same, he produced Ext.P1 NEET score card in the writ petition. He had registe
Provisional admissions in medical colleges must adhere strictly to established counseling protocols to safeguard merit in the admission process.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of strict adherence to the admission schedule prescribed by the Medical Council of India's Regulations 2000 and the principle of mer....
The court emphasized the application of Rule 12 (8) (ka) of the M.P. Medical Education (Admission) Rules, 2018, which governs the inclusion of vacant seats in subsequent rounds of counselling.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of merit and fair procedure in completing admissions to medical courses, and the entitlement of a wrongfully denied student to compe....
No legal right vested in the petitioner for allocation of vacant seat, as admission processes are bound by established counseling protocols, reflecting the principle of no fault leading to no prejudi....
Strict adherence to admission timelines is mandatory, and deviations are impermissible as per Supreme Court directives.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the admission of students to the MBBS course must adhere to the proper procedure for filling vacant seats as per the judgment of the Apex Cour....
The court upheld the principle of merit-cum-choice in admissions, confirming that procedural fairness is essential when rectifying errors in provisional seat allotment results.
Admission into Postgraduate Course in Dental Sciences – Undue sympathy would lead to perpetuating illegality and giving premium to students who got admissions illegally.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the merit of the petitioner should have been the sole criteria for filling up the 4 reverted seats from the All India Quota, as per the Regula....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
