IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
HARISH KUMAR
Nikhil Kumar, Son of Sri Jitendra Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
HARISH KUMAR, J.
1. Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner having completed his MBBS Degree in the year 2020 from the Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Science, Patna has completed his internship in the year 2021. Being eligible for Post-Graduate Medical Admission, the petitioner appeared in NEET(PG)-2024 and qualified for PGMAC-2024 counselling. Accordingly, he filled up online application form for attending Post Graduate Medical Admission Counselling for admission to MD/MS/PG Diploma/DNB (Degree/Diploma) Courses in Government Medical Colleges for the Session 2024. The petitioner participated in all the three rounds of counselling but no seat was allotted to him. After third round of counselling, some of the seats remained vacant and thus for filling up those vacant seats, Bihar Combined Entrance Competitive Examination Board (for short ‘the BCECE Board’) published Notice for Stray Vacancy Round Online Counselling vide Advt. No.BCECEB (PGMAC)-2024/20 and 2024/21 dated 20.02.2025.
3. The petitioner, being eligible for Stray Vacancy Round Online Counselling got his registration done. Last date for willingness and online registration-cum-choice filling for seat allotment was 23
S. Krishna Sradha v. State of Andhra Pradesh and Others
Manoj Kumar v. Union of India and Ors.
Vanshika Yadav Vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors.
The court upheld the principle of merit-cum-choice in admissions, confirming that procedural fairness is essential when rectifying errors in provisional seat allotment results.
The admissions of the petitioners were declared unsustainable and in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. They were directed to participate in the special stray vacancy round of coun....
Provisional admissions in medical colleges must adhere strictly to established counseling protocols to safeguard merit in the admission process.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of merit and fair procedure in completing admissions to medical courses, and the entitlement of a wrongfully denied student to compe....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of the 'merit cum preference' principle for seat allotment, as well as the interpretation and application of Rule 17 of the Jammu a....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of preserving merit in the admission process for Post-Graduate Medical Courses, despite deviations from the admission rules and the ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the obligation of the Karnataka Education Authority to ensure fair and transparent methods of seat allotment, and the illegality of allotting seats....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.