2000 Supreme(Raj) 1444
V.S.KOKJE, P.P.NAOLEKAR
Jagdish Prasad Sharma, etc. etc. – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
For the Appellant in DBCSA No. 837/99:Shri P.S. Asopa, Sr. Advocate with Mrs. Naina Saraf, Advocates.
For the Appellant in DBCSA No. 851/99:Shri Rajendra Soni, Advocate.
For the Appellant in DBCSA No. 403/2000, 404/2000, 484/2000 (Def.), 485/2000 (Def.), 486/2000 (Def.) and 489/2000 (Def.):Shri R.P. Vijay, Advocate.
For the Respondent Ayurved Deptt.:Shri Ishwar Jain and Shri Hanuman Choudhary, Advocates.
For the Inverters:Shri Resham Bhargava and Shri Mahendra Singh, Advocates.
JUDGMENT
1. - These appeals raise common point and were therefore heard together and are being decided together.
2. The appellants are desirous of being appointed to the post of Junior Ayurved Nurse/Compounder in the Department of Ayurved of the State of Rajasthan. They claim to be eligible for being considered as according to them, they held qualifications prescribed for the post. According to the appellants, till April, 1999, the procedure followed for recruitment to the post of junior Ayurved Nurse/Compounder was governed by an order issued by the Medical and,Health Department of the State of Rajasthan on 16.11.89. According to the order dated 16.11.89, the merit list of the candidates found suitable for appointment was to be prepared on the basis of marks obtained in the training examination batchwise and merit list was to be prepared on the basis of chronological batchwise seniority. All earlier selections were made by following this method. Howe er, on 19.4.99, the State Government revoked the order dated 16.11.89 and 15r a separate order also directed that the vacant posts be filled in in accordance with the procedure prescribed by Rule 20 of the Rajasthan Ayurvedic, Unani, H
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
Back
