SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Raj) 2379

H.R.PANWAR
Ramchandra @ Sriram – Appellant
Versus
Balkishan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants:Aklavya Bhansali, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Rajesh Joshi, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - This civil second appeal under Section 22 of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 (for short 'the Act of 1950' hereinafter) r/w Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure (for short 'the Code' hereinafter) is directed against the judgment and decree dated 17.5.2008 passed by Additional District Judge No.2, Jodhpur (for short 'the first appellate court' hereinafter) in Civil Appeal Decree No. 108/07 whereby the appeal filed by the appellants defendants against the judgment and decree dated 23.11.2004 passed by Additional Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) No.2, Jodhpur (for short 'the trial court' hereinafter) in Civil Original Suit No.34/2001, was dismissed.

2. During the pendency of the appeal, an application being I.A. No. 12861/08 came to be filed by the appellants defendants under Order 41 Rule 27 r/w Section 151 of the Code seeking to take on record the certified copy of the Voter List .

3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties on the application under Order 41 Rule 27 r/w Section 151 of the Code as also on the merit of the appeal. Carefully gone through the judgment and decree of the trial court as well as of the first appellate court.

4. Learned



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top