SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 2134

VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Ramdev – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mahipal Vishnoi, Advocate, Shrawan Bishnoi, Advocate, Manoj Kumar, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vinit Kumar Mathur, J. - The present bail applications have been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioners who are in custody in connection with F.I.R. No.03/2020, P.S. Khinwara, District Pali, for the offences under Sections 8/15, 29 NDPS.

2. In view of the order passed by this Court on 18.02.2022, Seizure Officer Mr. Manoj Kumar is present in the Court. He has filed his affidavit wherein it is stated that he was dealing with the commercial quantity of the contraband for the first time and was not aware about the directions issued by this Court and the notification issued by the Director General of Police. He further submitted that in a recent case wherein the commercial quantity of contraband was recovered, he has followed the entire procedure in accordance with the judgment of this Court as well as the directions issued by the Director General of Police. He submitted that it was a bona fide error and he undertakes that in future, no such lapses will be committed by him while investigating the matters of such nature.

3. Considering the fact that it was a bona fide error and the undertaking given by Mr. Manoj Kumar, a lenient view is taken in the matter by

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top