SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Raj) 17

[Citation : 2012(2) RLW 1525 (SC)]
(Supreme Court)
D.L. Nagpal (D) by L.Rs. Vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi (Singhvi, J.)
HON'BLE G.S. SINGHVI, J.
HON'BLE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J.
Darshan Lal Nagpal (Dead) by L.Rs.
Versus
Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
Civil Appeal No. 11169 of 2011, decided on 03.01.2012

Advocates Appeared
M/s. J.S. Wad & Co., for Appellants;
Sudarshan Rajan, for Respondents

Headnote:Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Sec. 4(1), 5-A(2) read with Sec. 17(1) and (4) — Invoking Sec. 17(1) and (4) dispensing the rule of hearing embodied in Sec. 5A(2) — Invoking urgency clause — 4 years time spent in the correspondence — Land acquired for construction of Electricity sub-station — Sec. 5A represents two facets of the rule of hearing that is the right of land owner to file objection against acquisition of land and of being heard in the inquiry required to be conducted by the Collector — No evidence produced to establish the urgency — Held — Acquisition quashed with the direction on fresh proceedings for acquisition, the appellants shall be free to file objection u/Sec. 5A(1) and shall be entitled to be heard in the inquiry to be conducted by the Collector in terms of Sec. 5A(2) of the Act. (Paras 14, 15, 27 & 28)

       Appeal allowed.

       Hkwfe vtZu vf/kfu;ee] 1894] /kkjk 4¼1½] 5-A¼2½ lifBr /kkjk 17¼1½ ,oa ¼4½ & /kkjk 5-A ¼2½ esa lekfo"V lquokbZ ds fu;e dks vfHkeqDr djrs gq, /kkjk 17¼1½ ,oa ¼4½ dk voyEcu ysuk & vR;ko';drk [k.M dk voyEcu ysuk & i=kpkj esa pkj o"kZ O;rhr fd;s & fo|qr mi LVs'ku ds fuekZ.k gsrq tehu vokIr dh & /kkjk 5-A lquokbZ ds fu;e ds nks Lo:iksa dk izfrfuf/kRo djrh gS fd Hkwfe vtZu ds fo:) vH;kifr nk;j djus dk rFkk dysDVj }kjk dh tkus okyh tkap esa lqus tkus dk Hkw-Lokeh dk vf/kdkj gS & vR;ko';drk LFkkfir djus gsrq dksbZ lk{; is'k ugha fd;k & vfHkfu/kkZfjr & vokfIr dh dk;Zokgh funsZ'k lfgr vfHk[kf.Mr dh & u;s fljs ls vokfIr dh dk;Zokgh ij vihykFkhZx.k /kkjk 5A¼1½ ds rgr vH;kifr nk;j djus ds fy, Lora= gksxk rFkk dysDVj }kjk nh tkus okyh tkap esa vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 5A ¼2½ ds fucU/kuksa esa lqus tkus dk gdnkj gksxkA ¼in la[;k 14] 15] 27] 28½

       vihy Lohdkj dhA

       

Hon'ble SINGHVI, J.—The questions which arise for consideration in this appeal are whether the Govt. of NCT of Delhi could have invoked Sec. 17(1) and (4) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, 'the Act') and dispensed with the rule of hearing embodied in Section 5A(2) thereof for the purpose of acquiring land measuring 80 bighas 15 biswas including 21 bighas 3 biswas belonging to the appellants for a public purpose, namely, establishment of electric sub-station by Delhi Transco Limited (for short, 'DTL') at village Mandoli and whether the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court had rightly negatived the appellants' challenge to the acquisition of their land.

2. For deciding the aforesaid questions, it will be useful to notice the events which led to the issue of notification dated 13.10.2009 under Section 4(1) read with Section 17(1) and (4) of the Act and declaration dated 9.11.2009 under Section 6(1) of the Act.

2.1 It is not clear from the pleadings of the parties and the record produced before the High Court and this Court as to when the decision was taken to establish 400/220 KV sub-station at East of Loni Road but this much is evident that by a communication sent in August, 2004, the DTL requested the Delhi Development Authority (for short, 'the DDA') for allotment of land. For the next about 10 months nothing appears to have happened. Between June and October, 2005 different functionaries of DTL made some correspondence interse in the matter of establishment of the sub-station. On 5/6.12.2005, Manager (400/220 KV SS&L) sent a communication to the Commissioner (Planning), DDA wherein he emphasized that establishment of the sub-station was necessary to meet the power demand of East Delhi and particularly the upcoming Commonwealth Games. In his reply dated 8.2.2006, Joint Director (MP), DDA informed the DTL that allotment of sites suggested by it is not feasible because site 'A' was developed as a park and site 'B' was earmarked as a community centre.

2.2 Between January, 2006 and July, 2008, the officers of the DTL, the DDA and the Government of N.C.T. of Delhi exchanged letters on the issue of allotment of land for the sub-station. While the officers of DTL stressed the need for early allotment of land, the officers of the DDA repeatedly expressed their inability to allot the particular site by pointing out that the same was reserved for other purpose. On 28.07.2008, Secretary (Power), Government of NCT of Delhi-cum-CMD, DTL requested the DDA to change the land use of the particular site and inform the Government of N.C.T. of Delhi so that action could be taken for the acquisition of land under Section 17 of the Act. In that letter, it was also mentioned that due to paucity of land, the DTL has proposed to establish a GIS indoor type sub-station which could be accommodated in a space of about 200 x 125 meters as against the original requirement of 700 x 500 meters. The relevant portions of that letter are extracted below:

"In pursuance of above, a meeting was held with Vice-Chairman, DDA on 6.5.2008 wherein a request was made for the allotment of land in East Delhi. Officers of Delhi Transco Ltd., State Transmission Utility, along with Officers of DDA and the concerned ADM of the area had identified the land in their joint inspection held on 30.6.2008. Copy of Khasra Nos. and their Report is enclosed as Annexure-I. However, in the meantime DDA informed that the land in question is not acquired by DDA. It was further informed that as per Master Plan, Agriculture/ Green area can be utilized for Utilities. Copy of the letter No. F.6(4)2004/MP/D-127 dated 19.5.2008 is enclosed as Annexure-II. Since the establishment of the Grid Station is of paramount importance for strengthening the power supply in East Delhi, DDA is requested to change the land use and to inform GNCTD so that action be taken for acquisition of the same under Section 17, i.e., for the public utility.

Earlier it was proposed to construct an outdoor 400/200































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top