NISHA GUPTA
Precision Cars India Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Porsche Middle East & Africa, F. Z. E. – Respondent
2. The short facts of the case are that appellant-Company is a private limited company registered under the Companies Act and is exclusive importer of cars, accessories and spare parts of the respondent companies for the entire Indian markets. The appellant-company entered into an agreement vide agreement dated 8.6.2007 for an indeterminable period with respondent No. 1, i.e. Porsche Middle East and Africa (hereinafter referred to at `PME') to sell new Porsche multipurpose sports vehicles, original spare parts, accessories etc.
3. Respondent No. 1 sent a notice vide e-mail to the appellant-company whereby it was mentioned that respondent-1 wishes to terminate the contract with the appellant-company which was executed on 8.6.2007 and the contract will automatically terminate after the period of 12 months, i.e. on 28.2.2012.
Bhatia International vs. Bulk Trading S.A. & Anr. ((2002) 4 SCC 105) 7
Dozco India Private Limited vs. Infracore Co. Ltd. ((2011) 6 SCC 179) 7
Union of India & Anr. vs. Raghubir Singh (D) by LRs. Etc. (AIR 1989 SC 1933) 7
Official Liquidator vs. Dayanand & Ors. ((2008) 10 SCC 1) 10
B.L. Shreedhar & Ors. vs. K.M. Munireddy (dead) ((2003) 2 SCC 355) 22
Adhunik Steels Ltd. vs. Orissa Manganese and Minerals (P) Ltd. ((2007) 7 SCC 125) 28
Percept D Mark (India) (P) Ltd. vs. Zaheer Khan & Anr. ((2006) 4 SCC 227) 29
Indian Oil Corporation vs. Amritsar Gas Service ((1991) 1 SCC 533) 29
Classic Motors vs. Maruti Udyog (65 (1997) DLT 166) 29
Rameshwari Devi vs. Nirmala Devi & Ors. ((2011) 8 SCC 249) 32
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.