DEEPAK MAHESHWARI
RAM PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
AJAY JAGDISH SINGH – Respondent
Deepak Maheshwari, J
Heard learned counsel for the rival sides and learned Public Prosecutor.
2. This misc. petition has been preferred on behalf of the accused-petitioners with the prayer to quash and set-aside FIR No.14/2017 registered at PS Sindhi Camp, Jaipur for the offences under Sections 420, 406, 477-A, 467, 468 and 120-B IPC.
Facts in brief :
FIR No.14/2017 came to be lodged at PS Sindhi Camp, Jaipur for the aforesaid offences on the basis of the complaint filed by the complainants-respondents No.2 & 3 through their power of attorney Rakesh Kumar Sharma, which was sent to concern police station under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C.
3. Briefly, the facts stated in the said complaint were that the complainants, who are non-resident Indians, were persuaded by the accused-petitioners on behalf of M/s. Comfort Living (Hotels) Private Limited in the month of October, 2013 to purchase a plot located in a residential scheme namely "Princessa" being developed by the accused-persons in Krishna Nagar, Gopalpura Bye-pass, Jaipur. It was stated that the plot is being divided in two parts i.e. B-8 (North) and B-8 (South). The scheme is approved by JDA. The amount invested in the s
Ajay Kumar Das Vs. State of Jharkhand & Anr.
Gagan Kishore Srivastava Vs. State & Ors.
Kamlesh Kumari & Ors. Vs. State of U.P. & Anr.
Mohammed Ibrahim & Ors. Vs. State of Bihar & Anr.
Pratibha Vs. Rameshwari Devi & Ors.
M/s. Medohl Chemicals & Pharma Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Biological E. Ltd.
State of Haryana Vs. Bhim Sain & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.