SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Raj) 285

P.K.LOHRA
Tapasvi Karan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Parmanand Saran – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Vinay Jain.
For the Respondents: V.L. Thanvi.

JUDGMENT :

P.K. LOHRA, J.

Appellant-defendant has laid this second appeal under Section 100 CPC to assail judgment & decree dated 4th of March 2016, passed by Addl. District Judge No. 1, Jodhpur Metropolitan (for short, ‘learned first appellate Court’), whereby learned first appellate Court has affirmed judgment and decree dated 19th of May 2014, passed by Addl. Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) No. 3, Jodhpur Metropolitan (for short, ‘learned trial Court’), decreeing the suit of plaintiff-respondent No. 1 for permanent and mandatory injunction.

2. Facts sans unnecessary details, as emerge from the record, are that plaintiff filed a suit for permanent and mandatory injunction against appellant-defendant and Municipal Corporation, Jodhpur and its Chief Executive Officer, inter-alia, stating that in the western side of his house one temple exists and in between plaintiff and first-defendant's house, there lies some open space which is just like a Chowk and is used as a way. It is further averred in the plaint that defendant encroached over the land adjacent to his house left out after the boundary of temple and has raised garage-type construction admeasuring about 10’ x 12’ which is being used by




































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top