SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Raj) 789

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Shrawan – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : M.L. Bishnoi
For the Respondent: N.K. Rai, Spl. P.P.

ORDER :

MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on record.

2. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 01/2014 of Central Narcotics Bureau, Udaipur for the offence punishable under Sections 8/18B, 8/25, 8/29 of NDPS Act. He has preferred this second bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The first bail application was dismissed by this court on 09.01.2018.

3. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the applicant is in custody since 10.03.2014 and initially the prosecution cited six witnesses in all, thereafter, the two more witnesses were added and now three prosecution witnesses are yet to be examined before the trial court. It is argued that the trial is being delayed by the prosecution and he is languishing in jail without any fault on his part. Learned counsel further argued that there is no likelihood whatsoever that the trial would be concluded in near future. He, thus, urges that the applicant, who does not have any other case under the NDPS Act against him, deserves to be enlarged on bail on the ground of delay in conclusion of the trial. In support of his contenti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top