IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
ASHOK KUMAR GAUR, J.
Dr. Naveen Jakhar S/o Shri Bhagwan - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 687, 1486/2022
Decided on : 01-02-2022
Education Law - Notification - National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test - Benefit of bonus marks - Post Graduate Medical Courses – Admission - Lettter/order whereby State Government has decided to consider experience of in-service Doctors to be counted upto 30.09.2021 for purpose of award of bonus marks while making admission in Post Graduate Medical Courses – Challenged - Petitioners participated in National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test - Postgraduate, 2021 held and all of them were declared successful in said examination. The petitioners, being government Doctors working in remote, difficult & rural areas, applied as in-service candidates in NEET PG 2021 examination and they all were entitled for incentive marks for services rendered by them in remote, difficult & rural areas – Held, Any action taken by the authority is required to be sustained with reference to the contents of impugned order/communication and the same cannot be justified by improving the same through the contention raised in the objection statement or affidavit filed before the Court - Power of State Government to take a conscious decision of fixing a cut-off date, keeping in mind the relevant considerations and factors, has been approved and the said order has also been upheld - Writ petitions dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
1. These writ petitions, since involve common question, as such with the consent of the counsel for the parties, are decided by this common order.
2. The petitioners, in the present writ petitions, are in-service Doctors who have challenged letter/order dated 08.01.2022 whereby the State Government has decided to consider the experience of in-service Doctors to be counted upto 30.09.2021 for the purpose of award of bonus marks while making admission in Post Graduate Medical Courses.
3. The facts, in nutshell, as pleaded in the writ petitions are that the petitioners participated in the National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test -Postgraduate, 2021 (for short 'NEET PG 2021') held on 11.09.2021 and all of them were declared successful in the said examination. The petitioners, being government Doctors working in the remote, difficult & rural areas, applied as in-service candidates in NEET PG 2021 examination and they all were entitled for incentive marks for the services rendered by them in remote, difficult & rural areas.
4. The petitioners have pleaded that initially a notification dated 14.04.2020 was issued declaring remote, difficult and rural areas and the relevant date for calculating bonus marks was prescribed as 30.04.2020.
5. The petitioners have pleaded that for Pre-PG 2021, the State Government had initially issued a letter dated 18.03.2021 whereby cut-off date for calculating the experience was prescribed as 30.04.2020.
6. The petitioners have pleaded that surprisingly another letter/order has been issued on 08.01.2020 by which cut-off date, for calculation of experience for the purpose of giving bonus/incentive marks, is extended from 30.04.2021 to 30.09.2021.
7. The petitioners have pleaded that the State Government surprisingly has made a reference of letter dated 26.10.2021 issued by the Medical Counseling Committee for extending the date to 30.09.2021 and the said date was only in relation to completion of internship by MBBS graduates and it had nothing to do with the in-service Doctors.
8. The petitioners have also pleaded that the impugned letter dated 08.01.2022 permits the candidates to get the benefit of bonus marks, for which otherwise they are entitled for in the next year of counseling i.e. 2022 and the National Board of Examination has also announced the schedule for NEET PG 2022 by holding the said examination on 12.03.2022.
9. Mr.N.K.Maloo, Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners has made following submissions:-
9.1 Cut-off date of 30th April of each year was prevailing practice for the State Government since 2018 for counting experience of in-service Doctors and long prevailing practice has been changed by the respondents this year in an arbitrary manner.
9.2 Granting of bonus marks by counting experience upto 30.09.2021 has completely changed the zone of consideration/the merit of in-service Doctors, who will complete their service of 1/2/3 years as on 30.09.2021. The said change is to the prejudice of the petitioners and other candidates having cascading effect, which is explained by citing an example that one person having 513 merit position shifted to 190 by granting him benefit of one year.
9.3 The State Government, while filing reply in S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.11583/2021 (Jitendra Singh Nitharwal v. State), had specifically taken a stand that candidates are provided experience on the basis of an ascertained cut-off date and the same is sacrosanct. Learned Senior Counsel submitted that once the State Government has taken a stand by filing affidavit on 04.01.2021, the extension of date by issuing notification dated 08.01.2022 is like taking a U-Turn and the State Government cannot be permitted to shift its stand.
9.4 The State Government has not kept in mind the relevant consideration while changing the date of counting experience as the category of freshers/MBBS students to complete their internship during COVID-19 period upto 30.09.2021 is altogether on a different footing and the same logic
P.Mohanan Pillai v. State of Kerala reported in 2007 (9) SCC 497
Kumari Shrilekha Vidyarthi v. State of U.P. reported in AIR 1991 SC 537
State of Bihar v. Ramjee Prasad reported in 1990 (3) SCC 368
Union of India & Anr. v. Sudhir Kumar Jaiswal reported in 1994 (4) SCC 212
UGC v. Sadhana Chaudhary & Ors. reported in 1996 (10) SCC 536
P.Mohanan Pillai v. State of Kerala reported in 2007 (9) SCC 497
Kumari Shrilekha Vidyarthi v. State of U.P. reported in AIR 1991 SC 537
Mohinder Singh Gill v. Chief Election Commissioner reported in 1978 (1) SCC 405
SupremeToday
The discretionary exercise of powers by the State Government in matters of policy, particularly in awarding incentives and setting cut-off dates, will not be interfered with by the Court unless such ....
Education Law - National Eligibility cum Entrance Test - Extension of date of completion of internship - Respondents have already extended cut-off date for completion of the internship, keeping in mi....
State regulations regarding post-graduate medical course admissions supersede national standards, and weightage for rural service is not a statutory right.
The principle of uniformity in granting monetary benefits and prohibition of discrimination within the class.
Courts should defer to the wisdom of administrators in academic institutions and regulatory authorities in matters concerning academic policies, including admission criteria, unless shown to be plain....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the validity of the State of Rajasthan's policy to restrict the benefit of bonus marks to employees who have worked under different organization....
The court affirmed the necessity of extending admission incentives to all in-service medical professionals, not just specific categories, upholding public interest and compliance with MCI regulations....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.