IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
ANOOP KUMAR DHAND, J.
Desh Raj Yadav S/o Chhaju Ram Yadav - Appellant
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6539 of 2015
Decided on : 16-10-2023
Bonus Marks - Appointment on Nurse Gr.II Post - Rajasthan Medical and Health Subordinate Service Rules, 1965 - Rule 19 - The court discussed the interpretation of Rule 19 and the grant of bonus marks for experience gained in different states under the NHM/NRHM schemes. The court concluded that the intention of the State was to confine the benefit of award of bonus marks to those employed in the enumerated schemes within the State of Rajasthan and not others.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought directions against the respondents to consider his case for appointment on the post of Nurse Gr.II and grant him bonus marks for experience gained in another state under the NHM/NRHM schemes. The respondents did not extend the benefit of 30 bonus marks to the petitioner as he did not have working experience within the State of Rajasthan.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the intention of the State was to confine the benefit of award of bonus marks to those employed in the enumerated schemes within the State of Rajasthan and not others.
Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner was entitled to bonus marks for experience gained in another state under the NHM/NRHM schemes.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the policy of the State of Rajasthan to restrict the benefit of bonus marks only to such employees who have worked under different organizations in the State of Rajasthan and not others was valid and not arbitrary.
Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed, and the stay application and all pending applications were also dismissed.
ORDER :
1. By way of filing instant petition, the petitioner is seeking directions against the respondents to consider his case for appointment on the post of Nurse Gr.II pursuant to the advertisement dated 26.02.2013 and grant him bonus marks for experience gained by him for the similar work of Government institution in other State i.e. Jammu & Kashmir.
2. Respondents issued an advertisement on 26.03.2013 and invited applications for appointment on the post of Nurse Grade-II in terms of Rajasthan Medical and Health Subordinate Service Rules, 1965 (for short, ‘Rules of 1965’). In terms of Rule 19 of the Rules, 1965, provision was kept for grant of 10, 20 and 30 bonus marks respectively for the one, two, three or more years working experience in any of the following scheme of the State e.g. National Rural Health Mission and Medical Relief Society.
3. The facts are not in dispute that the petitioner is having working experience of more than three years of Government Hospital and Research Centre at Srinagar, Garhwal i.e. out of State of Rajasthan. But benefit of 30 bonus marks was not extended to him because he is not working experience within the State of Rajasthan. Rule 19 of the Rules of 1965 deals with the provision of grant of bonus marks and the same is reproduced as under:
Provided that in case of appointment to the post of Nurse Compounder Junior Grade, the merit shall be prepared by the Appointing Authority on the basis of marks obtained in such qualifying examination specified in the Schedule appended to the rules and bonus marks as may be specified by State Government having regard to the length of experience on similar work under the Government, Chief Minister BPL Jeevan Raksha Kosh, National Rural Health Mission, as the case may be:
Provided further that the decision of the Appointing Authority, as to the eligibility or otherwise of a candidate, shall be final."
4. The Division Bench of this Court in the case of State of Rajasthan and ors. vs. Satya Dev Bhagaur and ors. D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No. 837/2019 has interpreted the above Rule and the word ‘State Government’ and decided the issue in question as under:
“As per the proviso in question a weightage in the form of bonus marks is given to the persons working with National Rural Health Mission, persons working with Government of Rajasthan Hospitals and other health related institutions and with Medi Care Relief Society. So far as the National Rural Health Mission is concerned, that is a nationwide scheme and, therefore, the persons working under this scheme are entitled to have weightage irrespective of the place of their working. All the persons working with National Rural Health Mission anywhere
Sher Singh and Others vs. Union of India and Others 1995 (6) SCC 515
Satya Dev Bhagaur and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors. reported in (2022) 5 SCC 314
Courts would be slow in interfering in policy matters unless policy is found to be palpably discriminatory and arbitrary.
The State Government has the discretion to extend weightage to a particular class serving in the State of Rajasthan only, and such discretion cannot be deemed discriminatory or arbitrary.
Entitlement to bonus marks under the Rajasthan Medical and Health Subordinate Service Rules, 1965 and the interpretation of the same in light of relevant case law.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the classification made by the rule making authority in granting bonus marks for working experience was unreasonable and violative of Articles....
The experience certificate for services rendered outside the state cannot be considered for appointment and awarding bonus marks in a different state.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of the relevant rules and advertisement provisions regarding the entitlement to bonus marks for employees of Ayurveda Researc....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.