Back
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Atma Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The matter pertains to an incident which occurred in the year 1992 and the present appeal has been pending since the year 1998.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that this Criminal Appeal has been preferred against the impugned judgment dated 27.02.1998, passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Hanumangarh in Sessions Case No.112/1994 whereby the appellant was convicted for the offences under Sections 325, 323 IPC & 3(1)(x) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and sentenced as under:-(all the sentences were ordered to run concurrently)
| 325 IPC | 06 months’ RI and a fine of Rs.200/-in default of payment of fine to further undergo 15 days’ S.I. |
| 3 (i) (x) SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act | 06 months’ R.I and a fine of Rs.200/- in default of payment of fine to further undergo 15 days’ S.I. |
| 323 IPC | 01 months’ S.I and a fine of Rs.100/-in default of payment of fine to further undergo 07 days’ S.I. |
2.1 Learned counsel submits that in the special circumstances, where the matters are of extremely
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
