2022 Supreme(Raj) 587
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Sohani – Appellant
Versus
Shambhu Lal – Respondent
Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ms. Yogita Mohanani.
ORDER :
1. The petitioner has preferred this revision petition for the following relief:
“It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court will be pleased to send for the record of the lower court, peruse the same and after perusal set aside the order dismissing the application of the petitioner u/s. 125 Cr.P.C. order for awarding the maintenance etc. to the petitioner or pass any other orders that this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper.”
2. Despite service, none appears for the respondent.
3. Counsel for the petitioner has shown Para-9 of the impugned order, which reads as follows:
^^i{kdkjksa ds e/; ;g rF; gSa fd ÁkFkhZ;k vÁkFkhZ dh ukrk;r iRuh gSA vÁkFkhZ ,uŒ,ŒMŒ 1 Jh 'kEHkwyky us viuh Áfrijh{kk esa ;g rF; Lohdkj fd;k gSa fd ÁkFkhZ;k Jherh lksguh ls mlus ukrk fookg fd;k FkkA iwoZ esa ÁkFkhZ;k us vÁkFkhZ ds fo:) /kkjk&125 nŒÁŒlaŒ ds varxZr ÁkFkZuk&i= ÁLrqr fd;k FkkA ÁkFkZuk i= dk fuLrkj.k vkns'k fnukad 04-10-1997 Án'kZ ,&2 ds }kjk gqvk FkkA ml vkns'k esa fo}ku vij eq[; U;kf;d eftLVªsV] ek.Myxढ us ;g ekuk Fkk fd ÁkFkhZ;k Jherh lksguh vÁkFkhZ dh 'kknh'kqnk iRuh ugha gS vkSj bl dkj.k ÁkFkhZ;k vÁkFkhZ ls dksbZ Hkj.k&iks"k.k HkRrk ÁkIr djus dh vf/kdkjh ugha gSA**
4. Counsel for the petit
Click Here to Read the rest of this document