PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA, VISHAL DHAGAT
Ankit Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
High Court of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER
Shrivastava, J.-- 1. This order will govern the disposal of W.P. Nos.10070/2021, 10186/2021, 10221/2021, 10232/2021, 10445/2021, 10916/2021, 10971/2021, 11048/2021, 11049/2021, 11155/2021, 11196/2021, 11197/2021, 11266/2021, 11272/2021, 11391/2021, 11415/2021 and 11650/2021 as it is jointly submitted by counsel for all the parties that these petitions involve same issue on identical fact situation.
2. For convenience facts are noted from W.P. No.10070/2021. In this petition as many as 68 petitioners have challenged the list of selected candidates dated 24.5.2021 declared for the purpose of appearing in the main written examination. They have also prayed for a direction to recompute the marks afresh based on the corrections/amendments/restoration of wrongly deleted questions, in the test for Civil Judges Class-2 (Entry Level – Direct Recruitment) online preliminary examination.
3. The advertisement dated 5.9.2020 was issued by the respondent- High Court inviting applications to fill up the post of Civil Judges Class-2 (Entry Level – Direct Recruitment). The advertisement wa
Point of Law : if a statute, Rule or Regulation governing an examination does not permit re-evaluation or scrutiny of an answer sheet (as distinct from prohibiting it) then the Court may permit re-ev....
Point of Law : Practice of calling for answer scripts/answer sheets and thereafter to order re-evaluation and that too in absence of any specific provision in relevant rules for re-evaluation and tha....
The court upheld the authority of the examination body, emphasizing minimal judicial intervention in academic matters unless clear errors are demonstrated.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.