PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Suresh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
ORDER :
1. In the wake of instant surge in COVID - 19 cases and spread of its highly infectious Omicron variant, abundant caution is being maintained, while hearing the matters in the Court, for the safety of all concerned.
2. This criminal revision petition has been preferred under Section 397 read with Section 401 Cr.P.C. has been preferred against the judgment dated 02.09.1999 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No.3, Udaipur in Original Criminal Appeal No.14/99 (133/98), whereby while upholding the conviction of the petitioner under Sections 454 & 380 IPC, as recorded by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No.2, Udaipur in the judgment dated 11.11.1998 passed in Criminal Original Case No.131/84, the sentence on each count has been reduced to six months simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs.200/-on each count, default of payment of which to further undergo seven days simple imprisonment.
2.1 The prayer made in the present petition reads as under:
Lakhvir Singh & Ors. Versus The State of Punjab & Ors.
Masarullah v. State of Tamil Nadu
Dalbir Singh Vs. State of Haryana
The central legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of a person below 21 years and without previous criminal antecedents to the benefit under the Probation of Offenders Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, based on the nature of the offence, the age of the appellant, and the absence of criminal ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.