Sarwan – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
ORDER :
1. In wake of instant surge in COVID-19 cases and spread of its highly infectious Omicron variant, abundant caution is being maintained, while hearing the matters in Court, for the safety of all concerned.
2. The present criminal appeal under Section 374(2) has been preferred claiming the following relief :
3. The matter pertains to an incident which occurred in the year 1991 and the present appeal has been pending since the year 1993.
4. Vide impugned judgment dated 20.08.1993, the learned Sessions Judge, Churu in Criminal Case No.154/92 though acquitted the accused-appellant for the offence under Section 376 IPC, but convicted him for the offences under Sections 448, 376/511 IPC and for the offence under Section 376/511, he was sentenced to undergo two years’ R.I., along with a fine of Rs. 500/-, in default of payment of which he was to further undergo one month’s R.I.; for the offence under Section 448 IPC, he was sentenced to undergo one month’s R.I., alongwith a fine of Rs.100/-, in default of payment of which, he
The central legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of a person below 21 years and without previous criminal antecedents to the benefit under the Probation of Offenders Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, based on the nature of the offence, the age of the appellant, and the absence of criminal ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of accused-appellants to the benefit under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, based on the absence of criminal antecedents and t....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.