SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 700

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
VIJAY BISHNOI, J.
M/s Ramnarayan Contractor, Through Its Partner Subhash Chandra S/o Shri Ramnarayan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, The Secretary, Indira Gandhi Canal Project, Jaipur (Raj.). – Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3681, 3687 of 2022
Decided on : 30-03-2022

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr K.K.Shah
For the Respondent: Mr Sunil Beniwal, Mr Saransh Vij

Headnote:

Constitution Of India,1950 – Article 226 – Rajasthan Transparency Public Procurement Act, 2012 - Section 38 - Power of High Court to issue Certain Writs – Appeals - Held, It is submitted by respondent that petitioner did not attend pre-bid meeting and raise any objection, rather it gave in writing that it has gone through conditions mentioned in bid document and is accepting all conditions - Respondent has further submitted that respondents are having full authority to impose condition No.s as per provisions of Act of 2012 and Rules made thereunder - It is also submitted that once petitioner has accepted all conditions of bid-document and given in writing, it is not open for it to turn back and challenge conditions of bid-document - Petitions dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

1. Since all these three writ petitions involve identical issue, therefore, they are being decided together by this common order.

2. For the sake of convenience, facts of S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3681/2002 are being taken.

3. The petitioner submitted its bid in response to the NIT No.CE-03/2021-22 issued by the respondent No.2 for construction of Gajuwas Minor from 0.00 km. to 22.980 km. including structures. The bid of the petitioner was accepted and contract was awarded to the petitioner. Acceptance letter was issued on 30.09.2021.

4. As per the petitioner, it started the work on 10.10.2021. It is the case of the petitioner that when the contract for execution of work was being signed by the petitioner with the respondent department, it noticed that two conditions are added in the contract, though there was no mention in the NIT about them. The two said conditions are 7.24 and 7.25, which are reproduced hereunder:

    “7.24 VEHICLE FOR INSPECTION OF WORK AND CANAL

The works shall have to be monitored by frequent inspections and also inspection of source canal from where water supply for the works shall be monitored hence the bidder will provide one new A.C Bolero 4X4 model along with driver and POL for inspection purpose throughout the execution period at no extra cost to the Department, the cost of inspection vehicle, driver and POL shall be borne by the contractor, non compliance will attract a penalty of Rs 3000/-per day.

7.25 RENOVATION OF ESTABLISHMENTS RELATED TO THE WORK

This is a very important work which has been taken up as per Chief Minister’s Budget announcement of 2019-20, timely completion of work is of prime importance. For effective monitoring of the works of CM announcement, works monitoring cell shall be established by the contractor in Division office at Taranagar. The Division office and sub division office shall be renovated like the old flooring shall be replaced by kota stone and vitrified tiles, walls shall be painted after repair of plaster and applying wall putty with approved washable distemper, the old electricity and sanitary fitting shall be removed and new fitting done using standard make material. The contractor shall provide Four nos. latest specifications computers (all in one) with UPS, one multifunctional printer and three laser printers, all of standard make for the monitoring cell along with two desert coolers and one water cooler with RO. Office Tables 4 nos of standard make, one office chair, visitor chairs 25 nos, 10 nos, 5 shelves slotted angle Rack of standard make. All the above activities shall be carried out by the contractor at his own cost and material provided for cell as mentioned above shall be the property of the department after completion of the work. All these activities shall be immediately started and must be completed within three months otherwise, penalty of Rs 5000/-per day shall be imposed on the contractor.”

5. It is the case of the petitioner that when the above referred two conditions are not part of the NIT, the action of the respondents of pressurising the petitioner to agree with them is absolutely illegal. The petitioner has, therefore, prayed that the writ petition may kindly be allowed with costs and appropriate writ, order or direction be issued to the effect that the condition of demand of new AC Bolero 4x4 vehicle and condition of renovation of establishments relating to the work free of cost may kindly be declared illegal and be deleted from special conditions of contract.

6. Reply to the writ petition is filed on behalf of the respondents, wherein preliminary objection regarding availability of remedy of statutory appeal is raised. It is averred in the reply that the petitioner is having an alternative remedy of filing a statutory appeal under Section 38 of Rajasthan Transparency Public Procurement Act, 2012. (hereinafter to be referred as ‘the Act of 2012’).

7. It is also averred in the reply to the writ petition that the condition Nos.7.24 and 7.25 a

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top