Shahrukh Khan S/o Asltaf Husain vs State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Raj) 702

SANDEEP MEHTA, VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Shahrukh Khan S/o Asltaf Husain – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. R.K. Charan
For the Respondent: Mr. B.R. Bishnoi, AGC

JUDGMENT :

MEHTA, J.

The appellant herein has preferred the instant appeal under Section 374(2) CrPC being aggrieved of the judgment dated 07.03.2019 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, District Rajsamand in Sessions Case No.32/2015, (CIS No.59/2015) whereby he has been convicted and sentenced as below:-

Offences	Sentences	Fine	Fine Default sentences
Section 302 IPC	Life Imprisonment	Rs.10,000/-	2 Months’ S.I.
Section 324 IPC	3 Years’ Simple Imprisonment	Rs.1,000/-	10 days’ S.I.
Section 341 IPC	One month’s Simple Imprisonment	Rs.500/-	5 days’ S.I.
All the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

2. Briefly stated facts relevant and essential for disposal of the appeal are noted hereinbelow:-

3. Smt. Nida Amrin (P.W.1), lodged a written report (Ex.P/1) to the SHO, Police Station, Rajnagar, District Rajsamand on 09.06.2015 at 9.00 pm alleging inter alia that she was at her home at about 8.00 pm. Her husband Mohd. Sharif had gone to fetch medicines. Shahrukh son of Altaf Hussain, resident of Nayakwadi, Rajnagar, District Raj

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(Raj) 702

SANDEEP MEHTA, VINOD KUMAR BHARWANIShahrukh Khan S/o Asltaf Husain – AppellantVersusState Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor – Respondent

Cases Referred (2)

SANDEEP MEHTA, VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Shahrukh Khan S/o Asltaf Husain – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor – Respondent