IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
Sameer Jain, J.
Sita Devi Educational Society, Bhilwara Through Its Secretary and ors. – Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department and ors. – Respondents
13200, 5864, 10222, 13652, 13806, 13825, 14157, 17038, 17770, 17609 of 2019, 7841 of 2016, 3966, 4033, 8406, 8407, 8409 of 2017, 1803, 27851, 27855, 25209 of 2018, 3439, 3450, 1753, 1757, 3544, 4027, 4028 of 2020, 3427, 3438, 7714, 3292, 3293, 4439, 4732, 4733, 7150, 7151, 291, 1057, 8189, 8648 of 2021
Decided On : 11-03-2022
Rajasthan Non-Government Educational Institutions Act, 1989 - of Sections 2(e), 2(p), 3, 5, 7, 33, 34, 42 ,43 - Rajasthan Non-Government Educational Institutions (Recognition, Grant-in-aid and Service Conditions etc.) Rules, 1993 - Rules 2(f) - Competent Authority - Rule 3 - Recognition of Institution – Rule 5 - Procedure for Recognition - Rule 7 - Withdrawal of Recognition - Competent Authority - Recognition of institutions - Penalty for transfer or closure of a recognised institution without notice and without satisfying the competent authority - Penalty for not discharging the duties of secretary - Delegation of powers - Power to make rules – Held, Private Colleges Policy whereby penalty provisions have been introduced are also illegal on account of fact that Commissioner, College Education or any other authority has not been delegated powers under Act of 1989 - In light of judgment of Apex Court in Canon India Private Limited (supra), Commissioner, College Education was not having any authority to issue such directions/ instructions /policy for imposition of penalty - Petitions disposed of.
JUDGMENT :
1. All these writ petitions involving almost common cause are listed before this Court under the order dated 17/11/2021 passed by the learned Division Bench of this Court in State of Rajasthan & ors. Vs. Lok Manya Tilak College, Ramgarh, Alwar (DB Special Appeal Writ No.690/2021) whereby the Hon'ble Division Bench observed as under:-
The appeal is disposed of accordingly."
2. As per observations of the Hon'ble Division Bench, referred to above, all the connected matters were tagged either as per directions of this Court or on insistence of learned Advocates representing various parties having common cause.
3. All these writ petitions were categorized in three broad categories and lead matters were taken up for disposal qua the issues which were identical on facts but were having different prayers.
4. The first set of writ petition was qua the declaration of policy issued by the Commissioner, College Education, Rajasthan as without jurisdiction qua the imposition of penalty for regularizing the deficiencies in temporary recognition as ultra-vires and illegal. In this regard, the lead case of Sita Devi Educational Society Vs. State of Rajasthan (SB Civil Writ Petition No.13200/2019) was taken up which was argued by learned Senior Counsel-Mr. Mahendra Shah.
5. In second set of writ petitions, apart from seeking directions to the respondents for issuance of No Objection Certificate, an additional prayer was made for striking down Clause 13 of the Private College Policy for the year 2015-16 and 2016-17 and in this regard, the lead case of Lok Manya Tilak College Vs. State of Rajasthan (SB Civil Writ Petition No.17770/2019) was taken up which was argued by Mr. Manu Bharagava, Adv. and other respective counsels.
6. The third and last category of writ petitions was qua prayers for issuance of directions to the respondents for issuance of NOC or for directions to the University to extend affiliation or for declaration of students from ex-student to regular student or for permitting the students to appear in the examination or for extension of temporary recognition. In this regard, the lead matter in Saraswati College, Reni, Alwar (SB Civil Writ Petition No.3292/2021) was argued by Mr. Ravi Kant Sharma, Adv. and other respective counsels.
7. Upon hearing the aforesaid bunch matters, the first and foremost argument which was taken up by learned Senior Counsel Mr. Mahendra Shah pertained to the powers of the Commissioner, College Education for imposition of pecuniary punishment by way of penalty for compounding the deficiencies for grant of temporary recognition and regularizing the same by imposition of the penalty for issuance of NOC. It was submitted by learned Sr. Counsel that if the penal provisions of the policy for various years are declared ultra-vires, illegal and beyond jurisdiction of the Commissioner, College Education, the instant bunch matters can be decided and the consequential relief asked for in the prayers can be granted without adverting to the issues of NOC/Policy and categorization of the students.
8. In the light of the said submission and on agreement being reflected by respondents' counsels appearing for the State, Universities represented by Mr. Prakhar Gupta, Mr. Vinod Gupta and others, at the outset, it was agreed upon to consider these matters on the
Canon India Private Limited vs. Commissioner of Customs
General Officer Commanding-in-Chief and Ors. vs. Subhash Chandra Yadav and Ors.
J.K. Industries Ltd. and Ors. vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors.
M.R.F. Ltd. and Ors. Vs. Manohar Parrikar and Ors.
Shanti Sports Club and Ors. vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors.
State of H.P. and Ors. vs. Himachal Pradesh Nizi Vyavsayik Prishikshan Kendra Sangh
The establishment of educational institutions must comply with statutory provisions, ensuring local educational needs are assessed to prevent unhealthy competition.
The impugned Government order was illegal and arbitrary as it was issued in exercise of power under Section 7 of the A.P. Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission and Prohibition of Capitati....
The NCTE has the sole discretion to grant or refuse recognition, and the State Government cannot interfere with this process. The NCTE can exercise the power to relax the provisions of the Regulation....
State policies cannot impede the NCTE's exclusive authority in granting recognition to educational institutions under the National Council for Teacher Education Act.
State-imposed conditions for educational affiliation that contradict AICTE approval undermine institutional autonomy and are unconstitutional.
The government policy on educational institution permissions must align with local needs as mandated by legislation, prioritizing educational access.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.