IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
SANDEEP MEHTA, KULDEEP MATHUR, JJ.
Rahul Birawat S/o Hastimal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17665 of 2022
Decided on : 25-11-2022
Compassionate Appointment - Validity of Rule 5 of Rajasthan Compassionate Appointment of Dependents of Deceased Government Servants Rules, 1996 - Rule 5.1 - Rule 5 of the Rajasthan Compassionate Appointment of Dependents of Deceased Government Servants Rules, 1996 - Summary of Acts and Sections: Rule 5 of the Rules of 1996, Rule 2 of the Rules of 1996, Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India - The court upheld the validity of Rule 5 of Rajasthan Compassionate Appointment of Dependents of Deceased Government Servants Rules, 1996, emphasizing the purpose of providing appointment on compassionate grounds to mitigate the hardship due to the death of the bread-earner in the family. The court also highlighted the strict construction of exceptional clauses/rules and the need to adhere to the interrelation of the rules. The court found that Rule 5 serves the purpose for which the Rules of 1996 have been framed and dismissed the writ petition.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner applied for appointment on compassionate grounds after the death of their father, a government servant. The appointment was cancelled based on Rule 5 of Rajasthan Compassionate Appointment of Dependents of Deceased Government Servants Rules, 1996, which restricts appointment if a family member is already employed in government service.
Finding of the Court:
The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the validity of Rule 5 of Rajasthan Compassionate Appointment of Dependents of Deceased Government Servants Rules, 1996.
Issues: Validity of Rule 5 of Rajasthan Compassionate Appointment of Dependents of Deceased Government Servants Rules, 1996.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the purpose of compassionate appointments to mitigate the hardship due to the death of the bread-earner in the family and the need for strict construction of exceptional clauses/rules.
Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
1. The facts in a nutshell are that the father of the petitioner, Shri Hastimal while working on the post of ‘Constable’ in the respondent-department, passed away on 16.08.2021. The petitioner applied for appointment on compassionate ground through an application dated 15.09.2021. The application was forwarded by Superintendent of Police, Pali to Inspector General of Police, Jodhpur Range, Jodhpur vide communication dated 22.11.2021. The application was further forwarded by Inspector General of Police, Jodhpur Range, Jodhpur to Director General of Police, Jaipur. The Director General of Police, Jaipur issued an order dated 25.02.2022 whereby, petitioner was allotted District Chittorgarh for compassionate appointment on the post of LDC. The Superintendent of Police, Chittorgarh directed the petitioner vide communication dated 21.03.2022 to appear before him with original documents of educational qualifications and character certificate along with other requisite documents. The communication dated 21.03.2022 was forwarded to Police Station Officer, Bali District Pali for submitting character verification report and inquiry report in relation to Rule 5 of Rajasthan Compassionate Appointment of Dependents of Deceased Government Servants Rules, 1996. The Director General of Police, Jaipur vide order dated 06.06.2022 cancelled the offer of appointment dated 25.02.2022, on the ground that elder son of Late Shri Hastimal, Shri Suraj is already working as Safai Karamchari with Municipal Board, Bali, District Pali and therefore, in view of provisions contained in Rule 5 of Rules of 1996, the petitioner is not eligible to be appointed on compassionate ground. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the vires of Rule 5 of Rajasthan Compassionate Appointment of Dependents of Deceased Government Servants Rules, 1996 praying for following reliefs:-
B. By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to include the persons like the petitioner other than the widow of the deceased employee in the proviso to Rule 5.1 of Rule 5 of the Rajasthan Compassionate Appointment of Dependents of Deceased Government Servant Rules, 1996 (i.e. Provided that this condition shall not apply where the widow seeks employment for herself) for the purpose of affording compassionate appointment.
C. By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the order dated 06.06.2022 (Annex.-14) and any other order denying the compassionate
The purpose of providing appointment on compassionate ground is to mitigate the hardship due to the death of the bread-earner in the family, and exceptional clauses/rules must be strictly construed.
Compassionate appointments must consider the employment status of dependents at the time of the deceased's death, not subsequent changes.
Compassionate appointment is an exception to the general rule and must adhere to the prevailing norms and eligibility criteria as per the policy.
The amendment to Rule 5 allows for compassionate appointment eligibility based on the dependent's status at the time of application, not just at the time of the government servant's death.
Compassionate appointment cannot be claimed or offered after a significant lapse of time and after the crisis is over.
Compassionate appointment cannot be granted if a dependent of the deceased government servant is already employed, as per Rule 5 of the Rajasthan Compassionate Appointment Rules.
Compassionate appointment is not a right but an exception, and the bar under Rule 5(1) applies when both parents are government employees, regardless of retirement status.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.