SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 35

PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Prem Kumar S/o Hetram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: A.S. Rathore, Pankaj Gupta.
For the Respondent: Mahipal Bishnoi.

ORDER :

1. This misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioner claiming the following relief:

    “It is therefore, most humbly and respectfully prayed, that this petition of the petitioner may very kindly be allowed, sentence awarded vide order dated 27.07.2021 passed in Criminal Case No. 277/2011, 306/2011, 463/2011 and order dated 29.07.2021 passed in Criminal Case No. 471/2011, by learned Judicial Magistrate, Rawatsar, District Hanumangarh shall be directed to run concurrently.”

2. Learned counsel for both the parties fairly concede that the present case is squarely covered by the decision rendered in S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 2883/2014 Rajender Kabra vs. State of Rajasthan decided on 17.02.2017. The relevant portion of the judgment in Rajender Kabra (supra) reads as under:

    “This second criminal misc. petition under section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner with a prayer that the sentences awarded to him in 32 different cases for the offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, details of whic

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top