SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 756

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
REKHA BORANA, J.
Madan Lal Mitharwal S/o Shri Tulchchha Ram Mitharwal – Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6202 of 2020
Decided On : 20-12-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Vineet Dave.
For the Respondents: Dhairyaditya Rathore, Pankaj Sharma.

Fulfillment of the parameters as laid down in the advertisement and lack of rejection of the petitioner's candidature on the ground raised by the respondents influenced the court's decision.

Headnote:

Outstanding Sportsperson - Teacher Grade-III (General Education) - 31.07.2018 - [31, 84, 15-03-2013, 21.11.2019] - The court discussed the conditions for an 'outstanding sportsperson' and the interpretation of the sports certificate requirements. It highlighted the recognition of the tournament by the Karate Association of India and the Ministry of Sports and Youth Affairs, emphasizing that the event did not need to be organized by the Indian Olympic Association or the National Sports Federation. The court's decision was influenced by the fulfillment of the parameters as laid down in the advertisement and the lack of rejection of the petitioner's candidature on the ground raised by the respondents.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought appointment as a Teacher Grade-III (General Education) in subject English, claiming to be an 'outstanding sportsperson' based on a national level Karate tournament win. The respondent argued that the petitioner's sports certificate did not meet the requirements specified in the advertisement.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner fulfilled the conditions for an 'outstanding sportsperson' and deserved appointment based on the final select list. The respondent's ground for non-appointment was deemed untenable.

Issues: Dispute over the petitioner's eligibility as an 'outstanding sportsperson' and the respondent's failure to appoint the petitioner despite inclusion in the final select list.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner met the criteria for an 'outstanding sportsperson' and should be appointed based on the final select list, rejecting the respondent's ground for non-appointment.

Final Decision: The writ petition was allowed, directing the respondents to grant appointment to the petitioner within four weeks, with entitlement to consequential benefits.

ORDER :

1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition with a prayer seeking appointment on the post of Teacher Grade-III (General Education) (Level-II) in subject English qua the recruitment process initiated vide advertisement dated 31.07.2018.

2. Brief facts of the case are that vide the abovementioned advertisement dated 31.07.2018, recruitment process was initiated and the petitioner applied qua the seats of District Nagaur. Total 502 seats were advertised qua District Nagaur out of which 10 were reserved for “outstanding sportsperson.” The provisional select list was issued on 03.09.2018 and the petitioner’s name found place in the same. Interestingly, the petitioner’s name found place in the final select list dated 09.01.2020 also but he was not afforded appointment. Against the said inaction on the part of the respondent-Department, the present writ petition has been preferred.

3. The case of the respondents is that the petitioner did not fall within the category of “outstanding sportsperson” as the certificate submitted by him does not comply with the requirements/parameters as laid down in the advertisement and therefore, the petitioner could not have been considered qua the said quota. It has further been submitted that the tournament in which the petitioner had participated had not been organized by the Olympic Association of Indian or the concerned Sports Federation as required in terms of the amended notification dated 15.03.2013.

4. It is not in dispute that the cut-off declared for the “outstanding sportsperson” category was 56.07 marks and the petitioner obtained 59.42 marks. The only ground for non-appointment of the petitioner is that the sports certificate submitted by him did not meet out the conditions as specified in the advertisement.

5. The conditions regarding “outstanding sportsperson” read as under:

    ^^¼[k½ mRd`"V f[kykfM+;ksa lacaf/kr Áko/kku & dkfeZd foHkkx }kjk tkjh vf/klwpuk Øekad ,Q&5 ¼31½ MhŒvksŒihŒ@,&2@84 fnukad 15-03-2013 ds rgr fd;s x;s la'kks/ku ds vuqlkj ^^mRd`"V f[kykfM+;ks** ls vfHkÁsr gS vkSj blesa lfEefyr gS jkT; ds ,sls f[kykM+h ftUgksaus%&

¼v½ bf.M;u vksyfEid ,lksfl,'ku ;k lacaf/kr ekU;rk ÁkIr us'kuy LiksV~lZ QsMjs'ku }kjk ekU;rk ÁkIr fdlh [ksydwn ds dksbZ varjk"Vªh; VwukesaV esa O;fDr'k% ;k Vhe Li/kkZ esa Hkkjrh; Vhe dk Áfrfuf/kRo fd;k gksA

¼c½ bf.M;u Ldwy LiksVZ QsMjs'ku ;k lacaf/kr ekU;rk ÁkIr us'kuy Ldwy xsEl QsMjs'ku }kjk ekU;rk ÁkIr fdlh [ksydwn ds dksbZ varjk"Vªh; VwukZesaV esa O;fDr'k% ;k Vhe Li/kkZ esa Hkkjrh; Vhe dk Áfrfuf/kRo fd;k gksA

¼l½ bf.M;u vksyfEid ,lksfl,'ku ;k lacaf/kr ekU;rk ÁkIr us'kuy LiksV~lZ QsMjs'ku }kjk ekU;rk ÁkIr fdlh [ksydwn ds dksbZ jk"Vªh; VwukZesaV esa O;fDr'k% ;k Vhe Li/kkZ esa esMy thrk gksA

¼n½ bf.M;u ;wfuoflZVht ,lksfl,'ku }kjk ekU;rk ÁkIr fdlh [ksydwn ds vkWy bf.M;k baVj;wfuoflZVh VwukZesaV esa O;fDr'k% Li/kkZ esa ;k Vhe Li/kkZ esa esMy thrk gksA

buls fHkUu ;ksX;rk j[kus okys vH;FkhZ dks mRd`"V f[kykfM+;ksa ds fy;s vkjf{kr inksa ij p;u gsrq vik= ekuk tk;sxkA mRd`"V f[kykM+h gsrq vkjf{kr inksa dks n.Mor vkj{k.k ns; gksxkA bl oxZ esa vH;FkhZ miyC/k ugha gksus ij buds inksa dks lkekU; ÁfØ;k ls Hkjk tk;sxkA**

6. Clause C of the above conditions would be applicable to the present matter which specifies that a candidate to be an “outstanding sportsperson” ought to have won a medal in a national level tournament in a sport recognized by the Indian Olympic Association or any recognized national sports federation.

7. A perusal of the sports certificate placed on record as Annex.2 clarifies that the petitioner had participated in the Senior Men category of the Karate-Do championship and won a bronze medal. The tournament has been mentioned to be organized by ‘Shito-Ryu Seiko-Kaikarate-Do India’ which is an organization approved by ‘Karate Association of India’ and recognized by the Ministry of Sports and Youth Affairs of the Government of India. The certificate mentions the championship to be of a national level. Meaning thereby, all the parameters as

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top