SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 2424

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.
Balwant Singh – Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab & Ors. – Respondents
CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 561 of 2023
Decided On : 12-01-2023

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. R.C. Sharma, Advocate; For the Petitioners
Mr. Charanpreet Singh, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab; For the Respondents

Headnote:(A) Punjab Recruitment of Sportsmen Rules, 1998 - Definition of 'Sportsman' under Rule 2(d) - Recruitment for posts of Central Head Teachers and Head Teachers - Petitioner claims eligibility based on participation in District Level Tournament but is ineligible per employer's conscious decision to prioritize medal winners - No grounds for issuing writ. (Paras 2-5)

(B) Certiorari - Scope - A writ of certiorari cannot be issued if the decision taken by the employer is based on a conscious and reasonable interpretation of eligibility criteria; absence from select list does not warrant judicial intervention. (Paras 5-6)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner applied for Head Teacher post under Sports Category but was declared ineligible as only candidates who won medals in District Level tournaments were considered by the respondents, as per the relevant rules.

Findings of Court:
The court found no merit in the petitioner’s claim as the rules clearly define the eligibility for appointment.

Issues: Whether the petitioner has a valid claim for inclusion in the select list and the validity of the employer's criteria.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that the employer's decision to exclude non-medal participants was reasonable and thus upheld the criteria outlined in the Punjab Recruitment of Sportsmen Rules.

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner claims rights for selection based on participation. (Para 1 , 2)
2. eligibility defined by winning medals, not mere participation. (Para 3 , 4)
3. writ cannot be issued if criteria are not met. (Para 5)
4. writ petition dismissed based on findings. (Para 6)

JUDGMENT

Mr. Anil Kshetarpal, J.

The petitioner prays for issuance of the writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the provisional select list because the petitioner's name is missing from the said list.

2. Pursuant to the recruitment notice dated 19.08.2021, and a supplementary notice certain posts of Central Head Teachers and Head Teachers were advertised by the concerned department. The petitioner applied for the post of Head Teacher under the Scheduled Caste (Majhbi and Balmiki) - Sports Category. The petitioner claims the right of consideration on the basis of a certificate of C-Grade i.e. participation at the District Level Tournament.

3. The learned counsel representing the petitioner claims that the petitioner has been declared ineligible as his name is not included in the select list.

4. Mr. Charanpreet Singh, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, submits that the respondent has taken a conscious decision to appoint the candidates who have won a medal in the District Level Tournament and not the participants. He, in support thereof, relies upon Rule 2(d) the Punjab Recruitment of Sportsmen Rules , 1998, which defines the word "Sportsman". The same is extracted as under:-

    "(d) "Sportsman" means a person of either sex who fulfils the following conditions, namely:-

    (a) In the case of recruitment to a reserved vacancy in Class I or Class II posts:-

    (i) that he belongs to the State of Punjab; and

    (ii) that he has won national championship in team or individual events while representing the State of Punjab in such sports events as have been conducted by such respective national federations as are affiliated to the Indian Olympic Association;

    Or

    (i) that he has won national championship in team of individual events which are organized by the Indian Olympic Association;

    Or

    (ii) that he has won first, second or third position in team or individual events and or he has won Gold or Silver or Bronze Medals at International Sports meets, conducted by International Federations affiliated to the International Olympic Committee or by the International Olympic Committee itself.

    (b) In the case of recruitment to reserved vacancy in Class III posts:-

    (i) that he belongs to the State of Punjab: and

    (ii) that he has won first, second or third position in team or individual events while representing the State of Punjab in a State Level Championship in any of the discipline affiliated to the Punjab Olympic Association organized by the State Level Federation.

    (c) In the case of recruitment to a reserved vacancy in Class- IV post:-

    (i) that he belongs to the State of Punjab: and

    (ii) that he has attained the first, second and third position in a District Level Association affiliated to the State Level Association in the respective discipline."

5. Once the employer has taken a conscious decision not to appoint the candidates who have merely participated in the District Level Tournament, the writ, as prayed for by the petitioner, cannot be issued.

6. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, no ground is made out to issue a writ. Hence, the present writ petition is dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top