Back
ANIL KSHETARPAL
Balwant Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner claims rights for selection based on participation. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. eligibility defined by winning medals, not mere participation. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. writ cannot be issued if criteria are not met. (Para 5) |
| 4. writ petition dismissed based on findings. (Para 6) |
JUDGMENT
Mr. Anil Kshetarpal, J.
The petitioner prays for issuance of the writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the provisional select list because the petitioner's name is missing from the said list.
2. Pursuant to the recruitment notice dated 19.08.2021, and a supplementary notice certain posts of Central Head Teachers and Head Teachers were advertised by the concerned department. The petitioner applied for the post of Head Teacher under the Scheduled Caste (Majhbi and Balmiki) - Sports Category. The petitioner claims the right of consideration on the basis of a certificate of C-Grade i.e. participation at the District Level Tournament.
3. The learned counsel representing the petitioner claims that the petitioner has been declared ineligible as his name is not included in the select list.
4. Mr. Charanpreet Singh, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, submits that the respondent has taken a conscious
Fulfillment of the parameters as laid down in the advertisement and lack of rejection of the petitioner's candidature on the ground raised by the respondents influenced the court's decision.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for sports certificates to be issued by approved sports associations recognized by the relevant authorities, as outlined in G.O.Ms.....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
