Back
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Satpal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. The matter pertains to an incident which occurred in the year 2012 and the present criminal revision has been pending since the year 2013.
2. This criminal revision petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 Cr., P.C. has been preferred against the judgment dated 31.10.2013 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sri Karanpur, District Sri Ganganagar in Criminal Appeal No.51/2013, whereby the judgment dated 07.09.2013 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Padampur, District Sri Ganganagar in Criminal Case No.508/12 giving benefit of doubt to the petitioner under Section 354 IPC and convicting him for offence punishable under Sections 394, 341 & 323 IPC was upheld. The petitioner was convicted and sentenced as follows :- 394 IPC : 03 year's RI and a fine of Rs.1000/- in default of payment of fine to further undergo 01 month's additional imprisonment.
341 IPC | - | : 01 month's SI and a fine of Rs.200/- in default of payment of fine to further undergo 07 day's SI. |
323 IPC | - | : 06 months SI and a fine of Rs.200/- in default of payment of fine to undergo 01 month's SI. |
All the sentences were ordered to run concurrently. | ||
3. Learned counsel for the accused-pet
The central legal point established in the judgment is the application of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, and the court's discretion to extend the benefit of probation based on the nature of th....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the application of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 and the court's discretion to decide the expediency of releasing the convicted person on....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of the accused-petitioner to the benefit under Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, based on the absence of crimin....
The court emphasized the reformative purpose of the Probation of Offenders Act, favoring rehabilitation for offenders without prior convictions.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the court's discretion to extend the benefit of probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, based on the nature of the offences, the c....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's discretion to extend the benefit of probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, based on the legislative intent of the Act an....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of the accused-appellant to the benefit under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 based on the absence of criminal antecedents and....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
