PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Narpat Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
Certainly. Here are the key points derived from the legal document:
Please let me know if you need a detailed analysis or further assistance.
JUDGMENT
Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J. - This Criminal Appeal has been preferred under Section 374 Cr.P.C. praying for the following relief:-
"It is, therefore, humbly prayed that the appeal of the appellants may kindly be accepted and the order under appeal may kindly be set aside and the appellants may be acquitted of the charges."
2. The matter pertains to an incident that occurred in the year 1992 and the present appeal has been pending since 1993.
3. Vide impugned judgment dated 07.06.1993 the learned Special Judge SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities), Jodhpur in Sessions Case No. 159/1992 and acquitted the accused-appellants for the offence under Section 397 IPC, but convicted them for the offence under Sections 332 and 333 IPC. The appellants were sentenced for the offence made out under Section 332 IPC and were directed to undergo three months' S.I., along with a fine of Rs. 200/- and in default of payment, they were ordered to further undergo one month's S.I. and under Section 333 IPC they were convicted for two years' S.I. and a fine of Rs. 500/- in default of payment, they were to further undergo two months' S.I.
4. Learned counsel for the accused-appellants submits that the accused
CCE vs. Bahubali (1979) 2 SCC 279
Dalbir Singh vs. State of Haryana
Lakhvir Singh and Ors. vs. The State of Punjab and Ors. (2021) 2 SCC 763
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's discretion to extend the benefit of probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, based on the legislative intent of the Act an....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the court's discretion to extend the benefit of probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, based on the nature of the offences, the c....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of the accused-appellant to the benefit under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 based on the absence of criminal antecedents and....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of the accused-petitioner to the benefit under Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, based on the absence of crimin....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 and the entitlement of the accused-appellants to the benefit of probation based on the abse....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the application of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, and the court's discretion to extend the benefit of probation based on the nature of th....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the application of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 and the court's discretion to decide the expediency of releasing the convicted person on....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.