NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Sudhir Kumar Kukar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. This Criminal Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Rule 315-H of Rajasthan High Court Rule for quashing the orders dated 12.04.2021 as well as order dated 21.12.2020 qua the petitioner.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent No.2 had filed a complaint against Divya Ashirwad Pvt. Ltd. before learned State Commission. In the said complaint, petitioner and petitioner's company Indo Crystal Pvt. Ltd. was not made a party. In complaint, no order was passed against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that by filing the execution application before the State Commission, respondent No.2 had not given any notice to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that respondent No.2 had not preferred any execution application under Section 71. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that application filed by respondent No.2 under Section 72 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 for non-compliance of the order dated 08.01.2019. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that a very first time, petitioner was arrayed as a party (accused).
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.