HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Vinit Kumar Mathur, J.
Abhishek Raj Bishnoi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan & Ors. – Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11760/2022
Decided On : 22-08-2022
AGE LIMIT - Student Union Election - Article 11(iii) - [11(ii), 11(iii), 11(iv)] - The court discussed the eligibility criteria under Article 11(iii) of the Constitution of MBM University, which sets the maximum age limit for contesting elections for Post Graduate Students at 25 years. The court highlighted that the conditions of Article 11(iii) cannot be said to be arbitrary and illegal, and referenced previous judgments supporting the age restriction for contesting student elections. The court emphasized that while education is a fundamental right, contesting elections is not, and therefore dismissed the writ petition.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a Post Graduate Student at MBM University, challenged the maximum age limit of 25 years for contesting the Student Union Election, arguing that it should be extended to 28 years due to the duration of the engineering course.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the eligibility criteria clearly set the maximum age limit for Post Graduate Students at 25 years, and emphasized that contesting elections is not a fundamental right for students. Therefore, the writ petition was dismissed.
Issues: The main issue was the challenge to the maximum age limit for contesting the Student Union Election for Post Graduate Students at MBM University.
Ratio Decidendi: The court established that while education is a fundamental right, contesting elections is not, and upheld the eligibility criteria setting the maximum age limit at 25 years for Post Graduate Students.
Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed as it was found to be bereft of merit.
JUDGMENT
Vinit Kumar Mathur, J. - Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The present writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:-
"(i) The Article 11(iii) of the Constitution of MBM University Jodhpur Students Union Objectives issued vide notification dated 02.08.2022 (Annex. 8) may kindly be declared illegal and void to the extent of fixing maximum age of 25 years instead of 28 years for Post Graduate Student contest the Student Union Election 2022-23.
(ii) The respondent MBM University, Jodhpur may kindly be directed to fix the maximum, age limit of 28 years for Post Graduate Student to contest the election of Student Union 2022-23.
(iii) The respondent MBM University, Jodhpur may kindly be further directed not to reject the nomination form of the petitioner for the post President of the Student Union Election 2022-23 on the ground that he has having the age of more than 25 years.
(iv) The respondent MBM University, Jodhpur may kindly be directed to accept the nomination form of the petitioner for the post of President of Student Union Election 2022-23 which will filed on 22.08.2022 while considering the maximum age limit upto 28 years instead of 25 years."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a Post Graduate Student and pursuing his studies in the Master of Engineering from MBM University, Jodhpur. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that since the graduation in the engineering is a five years course, therefore, fixing the maximum age limit for contesting the election for the students who are pursuing the Post Graduate course in the engineering wing of 25 years is erroneous. He submits that similarly situated persons who are pursuing the LLM course have been extended the benefit of the maximum age limit of 28 years. He, therefore, prays that the MBM University has committed an error while allowing only the students of the maximum age of 25 years who are pursuing Post Graduate studies to contest the elections.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently submitted that the maximum age limit for the Post Graduate students should be 28 years and fixing the maximum age of 25 years is nothing but debarring the students from their right to contest the elections. He, therefore, prays that the Writ petition may be allowed and the petitioner may be allowed to contest the elections as he is pursuing the Post Graduate studies in the MBM University.
5. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents submit that as per the Notification dated 02.08.2022 issued by the MBM University and as per the eligibility criteria enumerated in Article 11(iii) of the Constitution of MBM University, the maximum age limit to contest the elections for a person who is undergoing the Post Graduate courses is 25 years and since that condition is in existence even today, therefore, there is no reason to allow the petitioner to contest the elections for the year 2022-23. Learned counsel for the respondents has relied upon judgment of this court passed in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11897/2022 (Mohammad Sajid Quazi v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) and D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11730/2022 (Jagdish Chandra Gurjar v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) decided on 18.08.2022. He prays that the present writ petition is bereft of merit and, therefore, the same may kindly be dismissed with heavy cost.
6. I have considered the submissions made at the Bar and gone through the requisite documents as well as the Notification issued by the MBM University on 02.08.2022.
7. For the Brevity, the Article 11(ii to iv) of the Constitution dated 02.08.2022 is reproduced as under:-
"(ii) Under Graduate Students between the ages of 18 and 25 may contest elections. For the Students of four years and five years of professional courses; the maximum age will be 25 years.
(iii) For Post Graduate Students; the maximum age limit to contest the election would be 25 years.
(iv) For Research Scholars P.G. Diploma; the maximum age limit to contest
Contesting elections for student bodies is not a fundamental right, and eligibility criteria, including age limits, can be upheld as valid.
The judgment established that there is no fundamental right for every student to contest student body elections, and upheld the legality of the age restriction in the Constitution of Mohan Lal Sukhad....
The Supreme Court's directives on age limits for student elections must be strictly followed, and non-holding of elections does not justify further relaxation of these limits.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the previous order granting age relaxation was a one-time relaxation due to the specific circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic and was not ap....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that age relaxation can be granted to students for participating in the student union election due to exceptional circumstances such as the COVI....
The denial of valuable rights due to extraordinary circumstances such as the Covid19 pandemic may warrant the granting of age relaxation to ensure equal opportunities for participation.
The court considered the eligibility criteria in the student union constitution and relied on the recommendations of the Lyngdoh Committee and a previous court order to grant relief to the petitioner....
Selection Process - Age Limit “UGC Regulations 2018” did not stipulate a higher age limit for purpose of appointment to posts of Professor deliberately and that this is not an omission, since intent ....
An ineligible candidate cannot claim a seat in an educational institution, even if the institution failed to properly verify the candidate's eligibility.
The court reaffirmed that student union elections are a constitutional right tied to educational integrity and must comply with established guidelines to balance democratic participation and academic....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.