IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
RAVINDRA MAITHANI, J.
Vishal – Appellant
Versus
Kumaon University Nainital and another - Respondents
Writ Petition (M/S) No.3050 of 2023
Decided on : 01-11-2023
Age Relaxation - Student Union Election - The court granted age relaxation for two years to students for participating in the election of the student union of the college due to the COVID-19 pandemic, emphasizing the importance of providing opportunities for students to develop their leadership qualities.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a student of Government College, sought age relaxation of two years to contest the student union election due to the COVID-19 pandemic delaying the elections for two years.
Finding of the Court:
The Court granted age relaxation for two years to the petitioner and directed that any other candidates denied the chance to participate in the election should also be granted age relaxation. The Court dismissed a similar petition, emphasizing that the two years' relaxation granted did not relate to academic years but was a one-time relaxation due to the pandemic.
Issues: The main issue was whether age relaxation should be granted to students for participating in the student union election due to the delay caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court's decision was influenced by the need to provide students with opportunities to develop their leadership qualities, considering the impact of the pandemic on the conduct of the elections.
Final Decision: The petition was dismissed, and the Court granted age relaxation for two years to the petitioner and directed the same for other candidates denied the chance to participate in the election.
JUDGMENT :
By means of this petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs:-
(ii) Or/And pass any other order which this Hon’ble court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case.”
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3. It is the case of the petitioner that he is a student of Government College, Sitarganj, District Udham Singh Nagar. He intends to contest the elections. The age limit for under Graduate student is up to 22 years. But, due to COVID-19 Pandemic, the election could not be held for two years, therefore, relaxation of two year may be granted to him.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the age relaxation of two years needs to be granted to the petitioner in view of the judgment of this Court in WPMS No. 2167 of 2022, Ankit Bisht Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others.
5. In the case of Ankit Bisht (supra), the following reliefs were sought:-
b. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to decide the representation of petitioner.”
6. After discussing the matter, in para 3 of the judgment dated 08.09.2022, the Court had observed as follows:-
7. In fact, a similar controversy was raised before this Court in WPMS No. 2626 of 2023, Aakib Ahmed Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others. In the case of Aakib Ahmed, this Court has interpreted the judgment given in the case of Ankit Bisht. In paras 7, 8, 9 and 10, this Court observed as hereunder:-
2. There is no dispute at the Bar that because of the Covid-19 pandemic, no election could be held in the college for the last two academic sessions. Therefore, the petitioner, who is a student of D.A.V. (PG) College, Dehradun was denied of any chance of participating in the election as a candidate. Participation in the elections of college union is an integral part of the education, in view of the fact that an opportunity is given to the students for developing their leadership qualities and because such a valuable right has been denied to the petitioner, hence, the writ petition is allowed.
3. The respondent no. 3 is directed to grant age relaxation to the petitioner for two years for the purpose of participating in the election. This may be taken as precedence and any other candidates, who have also been denied of any chance of participating in election, may also be granted age relaxation for two years.
8. A bare perusal of the above order reveals that the Court had then considered the situation that has arisen due to COVID-19 pandemic, and due to which election could not be held for the student union of the college. Further, in view of the fact, that an opportunity is to be given to the students for developing their leadership, the Court had directed to grant age relaxation for two years for the purpose of participating in the election of the student union of college.
9. In Para 3 of the judgment dated 08.09.2022, passed in the first petition, the word, “two years” relates to the relief-(a), as claimed in the first petition, which means two years’ age relaxation, not relaxation of age for 2 years, including the year 2022-2023, and 2023-24. It was one time relaxation
The central legal point established in the judgment is that age relaxation can be granted to students for participating in the student union election due to exceptional circumstances such as the COVI....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the previous order granting age relaxation was a one-time relaxation due to the specific circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic and was not ap....
The denial of valuable rights due to extraordinary circumstances such as the Covid19 pandemic may warrant the granting of age relaxation to ensure equal opportunities for participation.
The judgment established that there is no fundamental right for every student to contest student body elections, and upheld the legality of the age restriction in the Constitution of Mohan Lal Sukhad....
The Supreme Court's directives on age limits for student elections must be strictly followed, and non-holding of elections does not justify further relaxation of these limits.
Contesting elections for student bodies is not a fundamental right, and eligibility criteria, including age limits, can be upheld as valid.
The court considered the eligibility criteria in the student union constitution and relied on the recommendations of the Lyngdoh Committee and a previous court order to grant relief to the petitioner....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the government had already increased the maximum upper age limit by two years and the concession granted by the Supreme Court in a similar cas....
The court reaffirmed that student union elections are a constitutional right tied to educational integrity and must comply with established guidelines to balance democratic participation and academic....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.