SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(UK) 433

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
RAVINDRA MAITHANI, J.
Vishal – Appellant
Versus
Kumaon University Nainital and another - Respondents
Writ Petition (M/S) No.3050 of 2023
Decided on : 01-11-2023

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Deep Chandra Joshi and Mr. Pankaj Semwal, Advocates

The central legal point established in the judgment is that age relaxation can be granted to students for participating in the student union election due to exceptional circumstances such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

Headnote:

Age Relaxation - Student Union Election - The court granted age relaxation for two years to students for participating in the election of the student union of the college due to the COVID-19 pandemic, emphasizing the importance of providing opportunities for students to develop their leadership qualities.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a student of Government College, sought age relaxation of two years to contest the student union election due to the COVID-19 pandemic delaying the elections for two years.

Finding of the Court:

The Court granted age relaxation for two years to the petitioner and directed that any other candidates denied the chance to participate in the election should also be granted age relaxation. The Court dismissed a similar petition, emphasizing that the two years' relaxation granted did not relate to academic years but was a one-time relaxation due to the pandemic.

Issues: The main issue was whether age relaxation should be granted to students for participating in the student union election due to the delay caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court's decision was influenced by the need to provide students with opportunities to develop their leadership qualities, considering the impact of the pandemic on the conduct of the elections.

Final Decision: The petition was dismissed, and the Court granted age relaxation for two years to the petitioner and directed the same for other candidates denied the chance to participate in the election.

JUDGMENT :

By means of this petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs:-

    “(i) To issue a writ or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding respondents to permit the petitioner for contesting election of Student Union for Academic Session 2023-24.

(ii) Or/And pass any other order which this Hon’ble court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case.”

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. It is the case of the petitioner that he is a student of Government College, Sitarganj, District Udham Singh Nagar. He intends to contest the elections. The age limit for under Graduate student is up to 22 years. But, due to COVID-19 Pandemic, the election could not be held for two years, therefore, relaxation of two year may be granted to him.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the age relaxation of two years needs to be granted to the petitioner in view of the judgment of this Court in WPMS No. 2167 of 2022, Ankit Bisht Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others.

5. In the case of Ankit Bisht (supra), the following reliefs were sought:-

    “a. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to grant 02 years age relaxation to the petitioner in upper age limit for contesting the election of student union of D.A.V. (PG) College, Dehradun.

b. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to decide the representation of petitioner.”

6. After discussing the matter, in para 3 of the judgment dated 08.09.2022, the Court had observed as follows:-

    “3. The respondent no.3 is directed to grant age relaxation to the petitioner for two years for the purpose of participating in the election. This may be taken as precedence and any other candidates, who have also been denied of any chance of participating in election, may also be granted age relaxation for two years.”

7. In fact, a similar controversy was raised before this Court in WPMS No. 2626 of 2023, Aakib Ahmed Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others. In the case of Aakib Ahmed, this Court has interpreted the judgment given in the case of Ankit Bisht. In paras 7, 8, 9 and 10, this Court observed as hereunder:-

    “7. After hearing the parties, the Court passed the following order:-

2. There is no dispute at the Bar that because of the Covid-19 pandemic, no election could be held in the college for the last two academic sessions. Therefore, the petitioner, who is a student of D.A.V. (PG) College, Dehradun was denied of any chance of participating in the election as a candidate. Participation in the elections of college union is an integral part of the education, in view of the fact that an opportunity is given to the students for developing their leadership qualities and because such a valuable right has been denied to the petitioner, hence, the writ petition is allowed.

3. The respondent no. 3 is directed to grant age relaxation to the petitioner for two years for the purpose of participating in the election. This may be taken as precedence and any other candidates, who have also been denied of any chance of participating in election, may also be granted age relaxation for two years.

8. A bare perusal of the above order reveals that the Court had then considered the situation that has arisen due to COVID-19 pandemic, and due to which election could not be held for the student union of the college. Further, in view of the fact, that an opportunity is to be given to the students for developing their leadership, the Court had directed to grant age relaxation for two years for the purpose of participating in the election of the student union of college.

9. In Para 3 of the judgment dated 08.09.2022, passed in the first petition, the word, “two years” relates to the relief-(a), as claimed in the first petition, which means two years’ age relaxation, not relaxation of age for 2 years, including the year 2022-2023, and 2023-24. It was one time relaxation

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top