SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1476

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Sandeep Mehta, Chandra Kumar Songara, JJ.
Om Prakash – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan & Ors. – Respondents
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11257/2022
Decided On : 22-08-2022

Advocates appeared:
Jagdish Kumar Vishnoi, Advocate., for the Appellant

Availability of suitable remedies for grievances and the role of the Public Land Protection Cell (PLPC) in addressing illegal encroachments.

Headnote:

Illegal Encroachments - Public Interest Litigation - Jagpal Singh & Others v. State of Punjab & Others, (2011) 11 SCC 396 - The court directed the petitioner to submit a representation to the District Collector concerned, who shall assign the matter to the Public Land Protection Cell (PLPC) constituted under the directions of the court. The PLPC shall have a thorough enquiry conducted into the representation of the petitioner in light of the directions given by the court and decide the same within a period of six months from the date of submission thereof.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a writ petition (PIL) seeking the removal of illegal encroachments on specific land and the construction of shops made by the encroachers.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner has available remedies for ventilating grievances as per the Division Bench Judgment of the court in a similar case. The court directed the petitioner to submit a representation to the District Collector concerned and assigned the matter to the Public Land Protection Cell (PLPC) for further action.

Issues: Illegal encroachments, failure of authorities to remove encroachments, public interest litigation, suitable remedy for grievances.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the availability of suitable remedies for the petitioner as per the Division Bench Judgment of the court and the directions given in the case of Jagpal Singh & Others v. State of Punjab & Others, (2011) 11 SCC 396.

Final Decision: The writ petition was disposed of with the direction for the petitioner to submit a representation to the District Collector concerned and for the Public Land Protection Cell (PLPC) to conduct a thorough enquiry and decide the matter within six months.

JUDGMENT

1. The petitioner has approached this Court by way of this writ petition (PIL) with the following prayers:-

      "i. by an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents may be directed to remove all illegal encroachments made by unknown encroachers on Khasra no. 614, 637, 640, 641, 660, 722, 724, 731, 732, 735, 739, 760, 766/612 situated at Gram Panchayat Padmetnagar Raneri reserved/entered as Gair Mumkin Magra Gochar land.

      ii. by an appropriate writ, order or direction the respondents may be directed to remove the construction of shops made by the encroachers who made encroachments upon gair mumkin magra gochar land (Khasra no. 614, 637, 640, 641, 660, 722, 724, 731, 732, 735, 739, 760, 766/612) of Gram Panchayat Padmetnagar Raneri, Tehsil Bap District Jodhpur;

      iii. by an appropriate writ, order or direction, an exemplary cost may kindly be imposed upon the respondent authorities for not considering the problems of public at large and failure in removing illegal encroachments/discharging their public duty for such a long period."

      2. Having heard and considered the submissions advanced by counsel representing the petitioner and, having gone through the material available on record, we are of the firm view that the petitioner has available to him a suitable remedy for ventilating his grievances by virtue of the Division Bench Judgment of this Court in the case of Jagdish Prasad Meena & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. passed in D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No. 10819/2018 decided on 30.01.2019 wherein this Court directed as below:-

          "This Court is inundated with large number of writ petitions, styled as public interest litigation, from almost all the Districts of the State, with allegations of encroachment over the pasture land/land of 'johad', 'talab'/river/river bed/public way/Shamshan/Kabristan etc. In all such petitions, common allegation is that despite repeated complaints/representations to the concerned revenue officers, no steps are taken by them to remove the encroachment. This results in number of writ petitions being filed by the complainants/representationists before this Court. This Court has been passing orders in such matters requiring the respective District Collectors to examine the factual content of the allegations and take steps to remove the encroachments so as to secure such land.

          In order therefore to provide a pan-Rajasthan solution to this ever persisting problem, we deem it appropriate to direct the Chief Secretary of the State to devise a permanent mechanism, which should be operational in every District of the State where the concerned District Collector should be required to periodically notify for the information of the general public to lodge the complaints/representations with regard to such encroachments with a specially designated Public Land Protection Cell (for short 'PLPC') for rural areas. The PLPC should be headed by District Collector and function under his direction and supervision. The PLPC shall get such complaints/representations enquired into by deputing concerned Sub Divisional Officer/Tehsildar/Naib Tehsildar so as to verify whether or not such encroachments have actually taken place on such land. If the allegations are found to be substantiated, appropriate steps in accordance with law be immediately taken for removal of the encroachments and appropriate penal action be also taken against the trespassers. The complaints/representations received in the PLPC should be decided by passing speaking order, informing the respective complainant/representationist about the action taken. This would obviate the necessity of such complainants/representationists approaching this Court directly by way of public interest litigation. If this practice is put in place, this Court would not be inclined to directly entertain such public interest litigation or would do so only in the event of inaction on the part of the concerned PLPC. The PLPC aforementioned shall also keep in view the guidelin

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top