HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Sandeep Mehta, Chandra Kumar Songara, JJ.
Om Prakash – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan & Ors. – Respondents
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11257/2022
Decided On : 22-08-2022
Illegal Encroachments - Public Interest Litigation - Jagpal Singh & Others v. State of Punjab & Others, (2011) 11 SCC 396 - The court directed the petitioner to submit a representation to the District Collector concerned, who shall assign the matter to the Public Land Protection Cell (PLPC) constituted under the directions of the court. The PLPC shall have a thorough enquiry conducted into the representation of the petitioner in light of the directions given by the court and decide the same within a period of six months from the date of submission thereof.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a writ petition (PIL) seeking the removal of illegal encroachments on specific land and the construction of shops made by the encroachers.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner has available remedies for ventilating grievances as per the Division Bench Judgment of the court in a similar case. The court directed the petitioner to submit a representation to the District Collector concerned and assigned the matter to the Public Land Protection Cell (PLPC) for further action.
Issues: Illegal encroachments, failure of authorities to remove encroachments, public interest litigation, suitable remedy for grievances.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the availability of suitable remedies for the petitioner as per the Division Bench Judgment of the court and the directions given in the case of Jagpal Singh & Others v. State of Punjab & Others, (2011) 11 SCC 396.
Final Decision: The writ petition was disposed of with the direction for the petitioner to submit a representation to the District Collector concerned and for the Public Land Protection Cell (PLPC) to conduct a thorough enquiry and decide the matter within six months.
JUDGMENT
1. The petitioner has approached this Court by way of this writ petition (PIL) with the following prayers:-
"i. by an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents may be directed to remove all illegal encroachments made by unknown encroachers on Khasra no. 614, 637, 640, 641, 660, 722, 724, 731, 732, 735, 739, 760, 766/612 situated at Gram Panchayat Padmetnagar Raneri reserved/entered as Gair Mumkin Magra Gochar land.
ii. by an appropriate writ, order or direction the respondents may be directed to remove the construction of shops made by the encroachers who made encroachments upon gair mumkin magra gochar land (Khasra no. 614, 637, 640, 641, 660, 722, 724, 731, 732, 735, 739, 760, 766/612) of Gram Panchayat Padmetnagar Raneri, Tehsil Bap District Jodhpur;
iii. by an appropriate writ, order or direction, an exemplary cost may kindly be imposed upon the respondent authorities for not considering the problems of public at large and failure in removing illegal encroachments/discharging their public duty for such a long period."
2. Having heard and considered the submissions advanced by counsel representing the petitioner and, having gone through the material available on record, we are of the firm view that the petitioner has available to him a suitable remedy for ventilating his grievances by virtue of the Division Bench Judgment of this Court in the case of Jagdish Prasad Meena & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. passed in D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No. 10819/2018 decided on 30.01.2019 wherein this Court directed as below:-
"This Court is inundated with large number of writ petitions, styled as public interest litigation, from almost all the Districts of the State, with allegations of encroachment over the pasture land/land of 'johad', 'talab'/river/river bed/public way/Shamshan/Kabristan etc. In all such petitions, common allegation is that despite repeated complaints/representations to the concerned revenue officers, no steps are taken by them to remove the encroachment. This results in number of writ petitions being filed by the complainants/representationists before this Court. This Court has been passing orders in such matters requiring the respective District Collectors to examine the factual content of the allegations and take steps to remove the encroachments so as to secure such land.
In order therefore to provide a pan-Rajasthan solution to this ever persisting problem, we deem it appropriate to direct the Chief Secretary of the State to devise a permanent mechanism, which should be operational in every District of the State where the concerned District Collector should be required to periodically notify for the information of the general public to lodge the complaints/representations with regard to such encroachments with a specially designated Public Land Protection Cell (for short 'PLPC') for rural areas. The PLPC should be headed by District Collector and function under his direction and supervision. The PLPC shall get such complaints/representations enquired into by deputing concerned Sub Divisional Officer/Tehsildar/Naib Tehsildar so as to verify whether or not such encroachments have actually taken place on such land. If the allegations are found to be substantiated, appropriate steps in accordance with law be immediately taken for removal of the encroachments and appropriate penal action be also taken against the trespassers. The complaints/representations received in the PLPC should be decided by passing speaking order, informing the respective complainant/representationist about the action taken. This would obviate the necessity of such complainants/representationists approaching this Court directly by way of public interest litigation. If this practice is put in place, this Court would not be inclined to directly entertain such public interest litigation or would do so only in the event of inaction on the part of the concerned PLPC. The PLPC aforementioned shall also keep in view the guidelin
Availability of suitable remedies for grievances and the role of the Public Land Protection Cell (PLPC) in addressing illegal encroachments.
The establishment of a permanent mechanism, the Public Land Protection Cell (PLPC), to address encroachments on public land and the court's reliance on the Division Bench Judgment in a similar case t....
The establishment of a Public Land Protection Cell (PLPC) in every district to address encroachments on public land and the requirement to follow the guidelines for eviction of illegal occupants of p....
The court emphasized the use of a permanent mechanism, the Public Land Protection Cell (PLPC), to address encroachment issues and directed the petitioner to utilize this mechanism for redressal.
The court emphasized the availability of a suitable remedy for ventilating grievances through the PLPC and directed the petitioners to utilize this mechanism for addressing the issue of encroachments....
The court emphasized the need for a permanent mechanism to address encroachment issues and directed the petitioner to follow the process established by the court in a similar case.
The court emphasized the need for a permanent mechanism, the PLPC, to address encroachment issues and provide a suitable remedy for grievances related to encroachment.
The establishment of the Public Land Protection Cell (PLPC) as a mechanism for addressing encroachments and the role of the District Collector in assigning matters to the PLPC for inquiry and decisio....
The court emphasized the availability of a suitable remedy for addressing grievances related to encroachments through the Division Bench Judgment and directed the petitioners to follow the prescribed....
The availability of a suitable remedy for land encroachment issues through the submission of a representation to the District Collector and involvement of the Public Land Protection Cell (PLPC) as di....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.