SANDEEP MEHTA, KULDEEP MATHUR
Hari Ram – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. The petitioner has approached this Court by way of this writ petition (PIL) with the following prayers:-
"a) That the respondents may kindly be directed to remove the entire illegal encroachment made by the encroachers on the "land in question" i.e. the land falling in khasra no. 736 and 739 of revenue village Roodiya, Tehsil Bhopalgarh District Jodhpur (Raj.) and the respondents may further be directed to take legal action against the encroachers and the authorities who have not taken concert steps for removal of this encroachment even after due representations and objections by the petitioner.
The respondents may further be directed to protect and develop the entire Aagore land of the abovementioned village by taking necessary action well within time so it cannot be encroached and damaged again by the encroachers."
2. Having heard and considered the submissions advanced by counsel representing the petitioner and, having gone through the material available on record, we are of the firm view that the petitioner has available to him a suitable remedy for ventilating his grievances by virtue of the Division Bench Judgment of this Court in the case of Jagdish Prasad Meena & Or
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.