HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Sandeep Mehta, Vinod Kumar Bharwani, JJ.
Uday Singh – Appellant
Versus
District Collector & Ors. – Respondents
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8140 of 2021
Decided On : 26-04-2022
Encroachment - Public Interest Litigation - The court directed the Chief Secretary of the State to devise a permanent mechanism for addressing encroachments on public land, establishing a Public Land Protection Cell (PLPC) in every district to receive and address complaints, conduct inquiries, and take appropriate action in accordance with the law. The PLPC was instructed to follow the guidelines issued by the Supreme Court in Jagpal Singh & Others Vs. State of Punjab & Others, (2011) 11 SCC 396, regarding eviction of illegal occupants of public land and restoration to the community.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a writ petition (PIL) seeking the removal of encroachments on specific land.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner had a suitable remedy available through the Division Bench Judgment of the court in a similar case, and directed the petitioner to submit a representation to the District Collector, who would assign the matter to the Public Land Protection Cell (PLPC) for inquiry and decision within three months.
Issues: The issue involved allegations of encroachment on public land and the failure of concerned revenue officers to take action, leading to the filing of public interest litigations.
Ratio Decidendi: The court established the need for a permanent mechanism, the PLPC, in every district to address encroachments on public land and instructed the PLPC to follow the guidelines issued by the Supreme Court regarding eviction of illegal occupants of public land.
Final Decision: The writ petition was disposed of with the petitioner being directed to submit a representation to the District Collector, and the PLPC was instructed to conduct an inquiry and decide the matter within three months.
JUDGMENT
1. The petitioner has approached this Court by way of this writ petition (PIL) with the following prayer:-
'It is, therefore, prayed that by appropriate writ, order or direction, respondents may be directed to take immediate steps for removal of encroachments on land situated at Khasra Nos.305, 2, 2/19, 28, 28/16, 41/3 & 41/4 of Gram Panchayat Lavera Kalla, Tehsil Baavdi, Dist. Jodhpur.'
2. Having heard and considered the submissions advanced by counsel representing the petitioner and, having gone through the material available on record, we are of the firm view that the petitioner has available to him a suitable remedy for ventilating his grievances by virtue of the Division Bench Judgment of this Court in the case of Jagdish Prasad Meena & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. passed in D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No.10819/2018 decided on 30.01.2019 wherein this Court directed as below:-
3. This Court is inundated with large number of writ petitions, styled as public interest litigation, from almost all the Districts of the State, with allegations of encroachment over the pasture land/ land of 'johad', 'talab'/ river/river bed/public way/Shamshan/Kabristan etc. In all such petitions, common allegation is that despite repeated complaints/representations to the concerned revenue officers, no steps are taken by them to remove the encroachment. This results in number of writ petitions being filed by the complainants/representationists before this Court. This Court has been passing orders in such matters requiring the respective District Collectors to examine the factual content of the allegations and take steps to remove the encroachments so as to secure such land.
4. In order therefore to provide a pan- Rajasthan solution to this ever persisting problem, we deem it appropriate to direct the Chief Secretary of the State to devise a permanent mechanism, which should be operational in every District of the State where the concerned District Collector should be required to periodically notify for the information of the general public to lodge the complaints/representations with regard to such encroachments with a specially designated Public Land Protection Cell (for short 'PLPC') for rural areas. The PLPC should be headed by District Collector and function under his direction and supervision. The PLPC shall get such complaints/representations enquired into by deputing concerned Sub DivisionalOfficer/Tehsildar/Naib Tehsildar so as to verify whether or not such encroachments have actually taken place on such land. If the allegations are found to be substantiated, appropriate steps in accordance with law be immediately taken for removal of the encroachments and appropriate penal action be also taken against the trespassers. The complaints/representations received in the PLPC should be decided by passing speaking order, in forming the respective complainant/representationist about the action taken. This would obviate the necessity of such complainants/ representationists approaching this Court directly by way of public interest litigation. If this practice is put in place, this Court would not be inclined to directly entertain such public interest litigation or would do so only in the event of inaction on the part of the concerned PLPC. The PLPC aforementioned shall also keep in view the guidelines issued by the Supreme Court in Jagpal Singh & Others Vs. State of Punjab & Others, (2011) 11 SCC 396wherein all the State Governments of the country were directed that they should prepare schemes for eviction of illegal/unauthorised occupants of the Gram Sabha/GramPanchayat/Poramboke/ Shamlat land and the same must be restored to the Gram Sabha/Gram Panchayat for the common use of villagers of the village. The said scheme should provide for the speedy eviction of such illegal occupants, after giving them a showcause notice and a brief hearing. It was further held therein that long duration of the illegal encroachment/occupation of land o
The establishment of a Public Land Protection Cell (PLPC) in every district to address encroachments on public land and the requirement to follow the guidelines for eviction of illegal occupants of p....
The court emphasized the use of a permanent mechanism, the Public Land Protection Cell (PLPC), to address encroachment issues and directed the petitioner to utilize this mechanism for redressal.
The availability of a suitable remedy for land encroachment issues through the submission of a representation to the District Collector and involvement of the Public Land Protection Cell (PLPC) as di....
The court emphasized the availability of a suitable remedy for addressing grievances related to encroachments through the Division Bench Judgment and directed the petitioners to follow the prescribed....
The court emphasized the availability of a suitable remedy for ventilating grievances through the PLPC and directed the petitioners to utilize this mechanism for addressing the issue of encroachments....
The establishment of the Public Land Protection Cell (PLPC) as a mechanism for addressing encroachments and the role of the District Collector in assigning matters to the PLPC for inquiry and decisio....
The court emphasized the availability of a suitable remedy for ventilating grievances through the PLPC and directed the petitioner to seek redressal through this mechanism.
The establishment of a permanent mechanism, the Public Land Protection Cell (PLPC), to address encroachments on public land and the court's reliance on the Division Bench Judgment in a similar case t....
Availability of suitable remedies for grievances and the role of the Public Land Protection Cell (PLPC) in addressing illegal encroachments.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.