SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1008

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Nathu Lal Meghwal – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
R.K. Charan, Advocate, Anees Bhurat, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.135/2018, Police Station Pur, District Bhilwara, for the offences punishable under Sections 8/15 & 29 of NDPS act.

2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the recovery of contraband was made from the co-accused Parasmal and after trial of the case, Parasmal was convicted under provisions of Section 8/15 of NDPS act and sentenced for about three years. Counsel further submits that the present petitioner was implicated in this case with the aid of Section 29 of NDPS act. He furthermore, submits that similarly situated co-accused Narayanlal Regar has already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court and the case of the present petitioner is similar to that of co-accused. The accused-petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application.

4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top