SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 2732

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Heer Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.K. Gaur, Advocate, M.R. Pareek, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner, who is in judicial custody in connection with F.I.R. No.VIII(IO)07/NCB/JZU/2022, Police Station NCB Jodhpur, District Pali, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 8/18, 25 and 29 of the NDPS Act.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has been implicated in this case with the aid of Section 29 of the NDPS Act. The petitioner is in the judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time. Therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the petitioner.

3. Learned Special Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application and submits that recovered contraband is commercial quantity and there is a call detail report between the present petitioner and the main accused, therefore, the benefit of bail may not be granted to the accused-petitioner.

4. I have considered the arguments advanced before me and gone through the material available on record.

5. Looking to the facts that the recovered contraband is commercial quantity and there i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top