PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Narayan Lal Depura – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. This Criminal Revision Petition has been preferred under Section 397 read with Section 401 Cr.P.C. praying for the following reliefs:-
"It is, therefore, most humbly and respectfully prayed on behalf of the petitioner that this revision petition may kindly be allowed and the order dated 07.02.2019 passed by the learned Special Judge, Prevention of Corruption Act Cases, Udaipur in Sessions Case No. 32/2016 may kindly be quashed and set aside."
2. Mr. Kuldeep Mathur, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Vineet Dave appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that vide the impugned order dated 07.02.2019, the learned Court below rejected the application filed by the petitioner under Section 227 Cr.P.C., and the learned Court below proceeded to frame the charges against the petitioner under Sections 7, 13 (1) (d)/13 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (as it then stood) read with Section 120-B I.P.C.
2.1. Learned Senior Counsel further submitted that a communication dated 08.09.2014 was issued by the Superintending Mining Engineer, Circle-Rajasamand, whereby, the then Mining Engineer, Rajsamand-II was forwarded a copy of complaint dated 08.09.2014, made by one S
Bhawna Bai vs. Ghanshyam and Ors. (2020) 2 SCC 217
Dilawar Balu Kurane vs. State of Maharashtra (2002) 2 SCC 135
Knati Bhadra Shah and Anr. vs. State of West Bengal : (2000) 1 SCC 722
State of Rajasthan vs. Ashok Kumar Kashyap
Union of India vs. Prafulla Kumar Samal and Anr. (1979) 3 SCC 4
Union of India vs. Prafulla Kumar Samal and Anr. 1979 CrLJ 154
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.