SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Raj) 1610

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Majorsingh Dillon S/o Late Shri Atma Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mudit Vaishnav
For the Respondent: Narendra Gehlot

ORDER :

1. Instant revision petition has been filed by the petitioner against the order dated 26.09.2024 passed by learned Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act) Cases, Sriganganagar whereby, the trial court framed charges against the petitioner for offences under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act and 384 IPC.

2. Brief facts of the case are that one FIR was lodged on the basis of complainant submitted by complainant before P.S. ACB Hanumangarh stating therein that he is a contractor and bill of Rs. 6 lacs was pending with the department and the petitioner is asking illegal gratification for clearing his bills. After verification of the complaint, a trap was arranged and a sumo of Rs. 5,500/- was recovered from the pocket of petitioner.

3. After investigation, the police submitted chargesheet against the petitioner under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act. Thereafter, arguments upon charge were heard and by way of impugned order dated 23.09.2024, charges were framed by the trial court. Hence, this revision petition.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there was no demand of bribe by the petitioner as the alleged bills were already paid on 08.03.20

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top