SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 907

DINESH MEHTA
Bhanwara Ram – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Dinesh Kumar, Advocate, for the Appellant
M.S. Bhati, PP, for the Respondents

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Mehta, J. - By way of the present petition, the petitioner has challenged order dated 27.07.2021, whereby petitioner's application for second parole of 30 days has been rejected by the District Parole Advisory Committee, Barmer.

2. The petitioner is serving the sentence for his conviction under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and read with Sections 3/4 of POCSO Act, 2012.

3. The petitioner moved an application on 04.06.2021 and prayed that he be given second parole of 30 days in accordance with the Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as "the Rules of 1958").

4. In furtherance of the petitioner's application, the report of concerned Superintendent of Police, Barmer was sought, whereafter, petitioner's application was rejected by the Parole Advisory Committee in its meeting dated 27.07.2021 on the basis of report furnished by the Superintendent of Police, Barmer dated 30.06.2021.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the Parole Advisory Committee has rejected petitioner's application solely on the basis of the illegal report sent by the Superintendent of Police, Barmer.

6. Inviting Court's attention towards the copy of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top