SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 950

ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Pradeep – Appellant
Versus
Pappu Lal – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Ram Singh Rathore, for the Appellant
Mr. Ritesh Jain, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. Application for early listing of the case stands allowed for the reasons stated therein.

2. With the consent of counsel for the parties, the appeal is heard on merits.

3. Instant appeal has been submitted challenging the judgment and award dated 29.09.2015 passed by the Court of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bundi, Rajasthan (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal') in Motor Claim Case No.258/2013 whereby an amount of Rs.12,19,500/- was awarded as compensation along with interest @ 7.5 % per annum under various heads on account of injuries sustained by the claimant-appellant.

4. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the claimant- appellant has sustained 90% permanent disability, but without any basis the Tribunal has assessed the same as 60% only and on the basis of the same, a meager amount of compensation has been awarded to the claimant-appellant.

5. Counsel for the appellant further submits that looking to the disability certificate Ex.-13, it is clear that after sustaining the injuries, appellant is facing difficulty is walking without support. Hence, looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, the award needs suitable enhancement.

6. Per contra, lea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top