SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1699

VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Narendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
Sanjay – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Manish Kumar Pitaliya, for the Appellant; Mr. T.R.S. Sodha, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that service upon respondent No.2 may be dispensed with at his risk and cost.

2. Ordered accordingly.

3. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant appeal is being heard and disposed of finally at this stage itself.

4. The instant appeal has been preferred by the appellant -claimant against the judgment and award dated 22.01.2018 passed by Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal No.1, Udaipur in Motor Accident Claim Case No.193/2007, whereby the Tribunal partly allowed the claim petition filed by the appellant-claimant and awarded a sum of Rs.2,39,600/- as compensation with an interest @ 8.5% p.a. on account of injuries sustained by Narendra Singh in the accident which occurred on 18.09.2016.

5. Learned counsel for the appellant-claimant submits that the Tribunal fell in error while deciding the issue No.2 and reducing the permanent disability sustained by the appellant to the extent of 12% from 24%. Learned counsel submits that on account of fracture of femur bone, the Medical Board assessed permanent disability of the appellant to the extent of 24%, however, learned Tribunal while computing the award in the pres

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top