VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Narendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
Sanjay – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that service upon respondent No.2 may be dispensed with at his risk and cost.
2. Ordered accordingly.
3. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant appeal is being heard and disposed of finally at this stage itself.
4. The instant appeal has been preferred by the appellant -claimant against the judgment and award dated 22.01.2018 passed by Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal No.1, Udaipur in Motor Accident Claim Case No.193/2007, whereby the Tribunal partly allowed the claim petition filed by the appellant-claimant and awarded a sum of Rs.2,39,600/- as compensation with an interest @ 8.5% p.a. on account of injuries sustained by Narendra Singh in the accident which occurred on 18.09.2016.
5. Learned counsel for the appellant-claimant submits that the Tribunal fell in error while deciding the issue No.2 and reducing the permanent disability sustained by the appellant to the extent of 12% from 24%. Learned counsel submits that on account of fracture of femur bone, the Medical Board assessed permanent disability of the appellant to the extent of 24%, however, learned Tribunal while computing the award in the pres
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.