SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 965

ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Chauth Mal Shringi – Appellant
Versus
Abdul Kalam – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mukesh Kumar Verma, Advocate, for the Appellant
Rohit Chaudhary, Advocate, for the Respondents

JUDGMENT

Anoop Kumar Dhand, J. - This appeal has been submitted by the claimants appellants against the impugned judgment and award dated 28.07.2015 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal No. 1, Kota (for short 'the Tribunal') in Motor Accident Claims Case No. 1290/2014 (105/09) whereby an award of Rs. 2,50,298/- was passed by way of compensation on account of death of Vikram in an accident which occurred on 04.11.2008.

2. The Tribunal after framing the issues, evaluating the evidence available on the record and after hearing counsel for the parties decided the claim petition of the appellants-claimants awarding compensation to the tune of Rs. 2,50,298/- under various heads in favour of the claimants-appellants.

3. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that at the time of accident, the age of the deceased was 18 years, he was a student and pursuing B.B.A. course. But the Tribunal without any basis determined the notional income of the deceased as Rs. 15,000/- per year. Counsel further submits that in view of the judgment delivered by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top