HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Rameshwar Vyas, J.
Ved Prakash – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
S. B. Criminal Misc. 2nd Bail Application No. 7613/2022 Connected With S. B. Criminal Misc. 2nd Bail Application No. 6855/2022
Decided On : 17-06-2022
N.D.P.S. Act - Bail Application - The court allowed the bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for the accused-petitioners who were in custody in connection with F.I.R. No. 493/2021 registered at Police Station Rawatsar, District Hanumangarh for the offences under Sections 8/15 & 25 of the N.D.P.S. Act.
Fact of the Case:
The accused-petitioners filed second bail applications under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. on the grounds of lack of evidence linking them to the recovered articles and being falsely implicated in the case.
Finding of the Court:
The court, without commenting upon the merits of the case, found that the bail applications deserved to be accepted and ordered the release of the accused-petitioners on bail.
Issues: The issues involved the lack of evidence linking the accused-petitioners to the recovered articles and the alleged false implication in the case.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting upon the merits of the case.
Final Decision: The court allowed the present second bail applications under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. and ordered the release of the accused-petitioners on bail.
JUDGMENT
1. The present second bail application has been filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner, who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No. 493/2021 registered at Police Station Rawatsar, District Hanumangarh for the offences under Sections 8/15 & 25 of the N.D.P.S. Act.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at the time of dismissing first bail application of the petitioner by this Court vide Order dated 25.01.2022, liberty was granted to the petitioner to file fresh bail application after recording the statements of the Seizing Officer and Investigation Officer. Afterwards, prosecution has got recorded statements of total three witnesses before the trial court including Seizing Officer as P.W. 2 Harbansh Lal and Investigation Officer as P.W. 3 Indra Kumar. He further submits that a perusal of the statements of P.W. 2 & P.W. 3 shows that prosecution has failed to relate recovered articles to be in the possession of the present petitioner. The present petitioner was not found on the spot at the time of recovery. The recovery was made from the Dhani of Chandra Prakash in the night. He further submits that for the same incident, two F.I.Rs. have been lodged against the petitioner on false material. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case without any evidence. The petitioner is behind the bars since 03.10.2021. The trial of the case will take sufficient time to complete. On the above grounds, he prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Having regard to the rival contentions of the parties and upon a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting upon merits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted.
5. Consequently, present second bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner - Ved Prakash S/o Jasram arrested in connection with F.I.R. No. 493/2021 registered at Police Station Rawatsar, District Hanumangarh shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
6. S. B. Criminal Misc. 2nd Bail Application No. 6855/2022 The present second bail application has been filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner, who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No. 493/2021 registered at Police Station Rawatsar, District Hanumangarh for the offences under Sections 8/15 & 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act.
7. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.
8. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been implicated as accused in this case on the basis of statement of the co-accused Praveen Kumar, who has already been enlarged on bail. On the above ground, he prays that the petitioner may also be enlarged on bail.
9. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Having regard to the rival contentions of the parties and upon a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting upon merits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted.
10. Consequently, present second bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner - Satpal S/o Dhanna Ram arrested in connection with F.I.R. No. 493/2021 registered at Police Station Rawatsar, District Hanumangarh shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/
The court's decision was influenced by the lack of evidence linking the accused-petitioners to the recovered articles and the alleged false implication in the case.
The court can grant bail based on the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.
The court considered the lack of evidence connecting the accused-petitioners with the alleged offences and their absence of criminal antecedents in deciding to grant bail.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the consideration of bail applications under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for the accused-petitioners who were in custody in connection with the offences....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the similarity of the petitioner's case with that of the co-accused persons who had been enlarged on bail influenced the court's decision to g....
Bail can be granted under Section 439 Cr.P.C. when the totality of circumstances, including lack of evidence and the potential length of trial, justifies such a decision.
The court's decision to grant bail was influenced by the nature of the recovered contraband and the expected duration of the trial.
The court's decision to grant bail was based on the lack of evidence connecting the petitioner with the recovery of contraband drugs and the petitioner's prolonged incarceration.
The court emphasized that bail should be granted when there is insufficient evidence linking the accused to the crime, especially when co-accused have been released on similar grounds.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.