HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Rameshwar Vyas, J.
Gajendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Misc. 2nd Bail Application No. 6910/2022 and S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 6986/2022
Decided On : 17-06-2022
N.D.P.S. Act - Bail Application - The court allowed the bail applications under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for the accused-petitioners in connection with F.I.R. No. 35/2022 registered at Police Station Sayla, District Jalore for the offences under Sections 8/22 & 8/29 of the N.D.P.S. Act.
Fact of the Case:
The accused-petitioners were in custody in connection with F.I.R. No. 35/2022 registered at Police Station Sayla, District Jalore for the offences under Sections 8/22 & 8/29 of the N.D.P.S. Act.
Finding of the Court:
Without commenting upon merits of the case, the court found that the bail applications under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. filed by the petitioners deserved to be accepted.
Issues: The main issue was whether the accused-petitioners should be enlarged on bail despite the charges against them under the N.D.P.S. Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the absence of recovery from the possession of the accused-petitioners and the lack of evidence to connect them with the alleged offences, except for the statement of the co-accused. Additionally, the absence of criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners was taken into account.
Final Decision: The court allowed the bail applications and ordered the accused-petitioners to be released on bail, subject to certain conditions.
JUDGMENT
Rameshwar Vyas, J. - S. B. Criminal Misc. 2 nd Bail Application No. 6910/2022
1. The present second bail application has been filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner, who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No. 35/2022 registered at Police Station Sayla, District Jalore for the offences under Sections 8/22 & 8/29 of the N.D.P.S. Act.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no recovery has been made from the possession of the present petitioner. As per prosecution story, Gajendra Singh sold the contraband to Durgesh s/o Hamira Ram, from whose possession, 11 grams of MDMA was alleged to be recovered. He further submits that after completion of investigation, charge-sheet has already been filed under Section 8/22 & 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act. However, there is no evidence on record to connect the present petitioner with the alleged offences except the statement of the co-accused. He further submits that there is no criminal antecedents against the petitioner. On the above grounds, he prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.
5. Having regard to the rival contentions of the parties and upon a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting upon merits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted.
6. Consequently, present second bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner-Gajendra Singh S/o Abhay Singh arrested in connection with F.I.R. No. 35/2022 registered at Police Station Sayla, District Jalore shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 6986/2022
7. The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner, who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No. 35/2022 registered at Police Station Sayla, District Jalore for the offences under Sections 8/22 & 8/29 of the N.D.P.S. Act.
8. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.
9. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per prosecution story, petitioner sold the contraband to Gajendra Singh, who has already been enlarged on bail by an order of even date by this Court. He further submits that after completion of investigation, charge-sheet has already been filed under Section 8/22 & 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act. There is no criminal antecedents against the petitioner. On the above grounds, he prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.
10. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.
11. Having regard to the rival contentions of the parties and upon a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting upon merits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted.
12. Consequently, present bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner-Rajuram S/o Babu Lal arrested in connection with F.I.R. No. 35/2022 registered at Police Station Sayla, District Jalore shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
The court considered the lack of evidence connecting the accused-petitioners with the alleged offences and their absence of criminal antecedents in deciding to grant bail.
The court's decision was influenced by the lack of evidence linking the accused-petitioners to the recovered articles and the alleged false implication in the case.
The court may grant bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. based on the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.
The court has the discretion to grant bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C based on the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.
The court has the discretion to grant bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C after considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case.
The court considered the absence of recovery from the accused petitioners' possession and the filing of the challan as justifying the grant of bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. without expressing any op....
The court granted bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. based on the release of a co-accused and absence of apprehension of the petitioner fleeing justice.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the consideration of bail applications under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for the accused-petitioners who were in custody in connection with the offences....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.