SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1268

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Farsa Ram – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Arjun Singh, Advocate, Kirta Ram Meghwal, Advocate, Mahipal Bishnoi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No. 263/2021 of Police Station Bap, District Jodhpur, for the offence punishable under Sections 457, 380, 307, 447, 458, 395 of IPC and under Section 3/25 of arms act. They have preferred these bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

2. Learned counsels for the petitioners submit that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case and no one has been injured in this case. Counsels further submit that challan of the case has already been presented. The accused-petitioners are in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioners.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail applications. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

4. accordingly, the bail applications filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. are allowed and it is directed that petitioners (1) Farsa Ram S/o Bhagwana Ram and (2) Ramniw

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top