SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1023

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Hanuman – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
R.C. Purohit, Advocate, Arun Kumar, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.123/2021, Police Station Kachola, District Bhilwara, for the offences punishable under Sections 452, 302/34, 120B, 212, 225 of IPC and Sections 3/25 & 4/25 of arms act.

2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that similarly situated co-accused Rajendra @ Rajesh, Suraj @ Suresh and Sheru have already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court and the case of the present petitioner is similar to that of co-accused. Counsel further submits that the main allegation has been levelled against the accused persons Kuldeep Singh and Tejandra @ Ranu. challan of the case has already been presented. The accused-petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application.

4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to gr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top