SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1691

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Hadman Ram – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
R.S. Choudhary, Advocate, Anita Gehlot, Advocate, Kamal Rathore, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the learned Public Prosecutor as well as counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record.

2. The instant appeal has been filed under Section 14a(2) of SC/ST (Prevention of atrocity) act on behalf of the appellant, who is in custody in connection with FIR No.63/2022, Police Station Pipar City, District Jodhpur for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 365, 354, 376/511 IPC and Section 3(1)(w)(i) and 3(2)(Va) of Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of atrocities) act against the order dated 14.03.2022 passed by learned Special Judge SC/ST (Prevention of atrocity Cases), Jodhpur whereby the bail application preferred under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the appellant was rejected.

3. It has been submitted on behalf of the appellant that now the challan has already been filed and the appellant is behind the bars since 04.03.2022 and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-appellant.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have opposed the prayer for bail.

5. Having rega

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top