SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1300

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Rakesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Om Rajpurohit, Advocate, Shashi Shekhar Patel, Advocate, Mahipal Bishnoi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.94/2021, Police Station Rajaldesar, Distt. Churu for the offence under Sections 363, 376(3) IPC and Section 3/4 of POCSO Act.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that according to the statement of the prosecutrix recorded under Section 161 as well as 164 Cr.P.C., she has not made any allegation of rape against the present petitioner. Now, challan of the case has already been presented. No investigation is pending against the petitioner. The accused-petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded.

3. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

5. I have considered the arguments advanced before me and gone through the material available on record.

6. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail.

7. Accordingly, the bail application under Sect

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top