HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Devendra Kachhawaha, J.
Dungar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4016 of 2022
Decided On : 08-04-2022
Bail Application - Offence under Indian Penal Code - The court granted bail to the petitioner based on the facts that the head injury of the injured was attributed to a co-accused and not to the petitioner, and that further investigation and trial would take a long time.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in connection with an FIR for offences under the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner claimed innocence and stated that no investigation or recovery was pending against him.
Finding of the Court:
The court, without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, granted bail to the petitioner based on the circumstances that the head injury of the injured was attributed to a co-accused and not to the petitioner, and that further investigation and trial would take a long time.
Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner should be granted bail considering the allegations and the opposition from the public prosecutor and the complainant's counsel.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the fact that the head injury of the injured was attributed to a co-accused and not to the petitioner, and that further investigation and trial would take a long time.
Final Decision: The bail application of the petitioner was allowed, and the petitioner was ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and surety bonds.
JUDGMENT
Devendra Kachhawaha, J. - The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner, who is in judicial custody in connection with F.I.R. No.07/2022, Police Station Kotwali, District Jaisalmer, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 325 and 307/149 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. Heard and considered the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant. Perused the material available on record.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that head injury of the injured Lakh Singh is attributed to co-accused Madho Singh; petitioner is a student; due to some rivalry, petitioner has been implicated in this case; petitioner is behind the bars since 05.01.2022; no investigation or recovery is pending against the petitioner; and trial will take time. With these submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner prayed that the benefit of bail may be granted to the petitioner.
4. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant have fervently and vehemently opposed the bail application of the accused-petitioner and stated that the accused-petitioner is the driver of that vehicle in which complainant was kidnapped and earlier six other cases were registered against the accused-petitioner.
5. In reply, learned counsel for the petitioner stated that in one case mentioned at S.No.3 in para 6 of the rejection order, petitioner was acquitted on 17.02.2020, therefore, only five cases are pending against the petitioner.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly looking to the facts that head injury of the injured Lakh Singh is attributed to co-accused Madho Singh and not to the present petitioner; further investigation and trial will take sufficiently long time, therefore, without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted.
7. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the petitioner, Dungar Singh S/o Sh. Indra Singh, arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.07/2022, Police Station Kotwali, District Jaisalmer, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
The court established that the nature of injuries and the duration of judicial custody are critical factors in determining the grant of bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the nature of the offences and the expected duration of further investigation and trial are crucial factors in considering a bail applicati....
The court established that bail should be granted based on the principle of equality among co-accused and the consideration of trial duration, reinforcing the presumption of innocence.
The court may grant bail based on the triability of the offences by the Magistrate, filing of charge-sheet, and the expected duration of the trial.
The court established that the presumption of innocence and the circumstances surrounding the case, including the status of co-accused and the delay in trial, are critical in deciding bail applicatio....
The court established that prolonged custody and the nature of the offences can be sufficient grounds for granting bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
The key legal principle established is that bail may be granted based on the circumstances of false implication and the lengthy trial process.
The court reaffirmed that the grant of bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. can be justified based on the nature of the offence, the status of investigations, and the anticipated duration of the trial.
The court established that bail can be granted under Section 439 Cr.P.C. when the charge-sheet is filed, co-accused have been granted bail, and the trial is likely to be prolonged.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.