SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 971

YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT
Amarbharti – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Suresh Kumar Maru, Advocate, Manish Dhebana, Advocate, Sumer Singh, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Yogendra Kumar Purohit, J. - The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No.186/2022 Police Station Samdari, District Barmer for the offences under Sections 341, 323/34, 307, 427 of IPC.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. The present petitioner is the driver of the alleged vehicle. The accused-petitioner has neither committed any beating, injuries nor has given threatening to complainant and no recovery has been made from him. As per the FIR itself the beatings have been given by Surendra Singh and Mahipal Singh only. The petitioner has only damaged the car. The accused-petitioner is in incarceration since 11.12.2022. The conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time, therefore, it is prayed that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail and submitted that the investigation is pending and there is allegation of causing in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top