2022 Supreme(Raj) 1362
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Arun Bhansali, J.
Pawan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India & Ors. – Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2819/2022
Decided On : 07-04-2022
Mr. M.A.Siddiqui, Mr. Sikander Khan, Advocate, for the Petitioner
Mr.Mukul Singhvi, Advocate, for the Respondent
The court emphasized the importance of considering the availability of medical facilities near the transferred place in cases involving family medical needs.
Headnote:
Transfer - Medical Condition of Mother - Availability of Medical Facilities
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner was transferred from Rawatbhata to Pazhayakayal, and his representation against the transfer was rejected. The petitioner's mother was undergoing treatment in Chandigarh, and he sought to stay at Rawatbhata for her treatment.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the medical facilities near Pazhayakayal were sufficient for the petitioner's mother's treatment, and the insistence to stay at Rawatbhata for treatment in Chandigarh was not justified. The court also dismissed allegations of malafides in the transfer decision.
Issues: The main issue was the petitioner's request to stay at Rawatbhata for his mother's treatment despite being transferred to Pazhayakayal.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the availability of medical facilities near the transferred place made the petitioner's insistence to stay at Rawatbhata for his mother's treatment unjustified.
Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed as the court found no substance in the petitioner's claims.
JUDGMENT
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner aggrieved against the order dated 16/2/2022, whereby, the representation made by the petitioner qua his order of transfer dated 27/1/2022 from Rawatbhata to Pazhayakayal has been rejected.
2. By order dated 27/1/2022 the petitioner was transferred with immediate effect by indicating that as the transfer was in public interest, he would be entitled to transfer TA, joining time, joining time pay etc. as admissible.
3. Feeling aggrieved, the petitioner filed S.B.Civil Writ Petition no. 2138/2022, which came to be decided by order dated , 8/2/2022wherein, the order of transfer was not interfered with. However, the plea raised by the petitioner regarding family inconvenience faced by the petitioner on account of his wife serving at Rawatbhata and mother undergoing treatment under advice from Chandigarh, it was observed that the said aspect can be raised by the petitioner before the competent authority.
4. The petitioner made representation, which came to be rejected by order dated 16/2/2022 inter alia observing that the petitioner may explore the possibilities to avail required treatment for his parents at his present place of posting and he was advised to report at Pazhayakayal with immediate effect.Feeling aggrieved, the present writ petition has been filed.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner made submissions that the respondents were not justified in rejecting the representation of the petitioner in a cursory manner without application of mind and that the submissions made by the petitioner have not been considered.
6. Submissions 6have been made that there is no reason for the respondents to transfer the petitioner to a far off place and that as the mother of the petitioner is undergoing treatment at Chandigarh, it was not justified for the respondents to transfer the petitioner to far south and, therefore, the order impugned deserves to be set aside.
7. An additional affidavit was also filed by the petitioner inter alia indicating that Pazhayakayal, where the petitioner has been transferred is not a district Headquarter as it is a part of District Tuticorin and that medical facilities are not available at the transferred place for mother of the petitioner, who is suffering from cancer and that there is no specialized centre for treatment of cancer nearby the transferred place.
8. During the pendency of the writ petition, learned counsel for the respondents was directed to indicate the status of medical facilities available around the place where the petitioner has been transferred.
9. An additional affidavit has been filed by the respondents inter alia indicating that Chandigarh is about 800 km. away from Rawatbhata, where the petitioner is presently stationed. Excellent medical facilities at not too far places from Pazhayakayal in cities like Madurai, Thiruvananathapuram and Chennai are available. The distance from Pazhayakayal to Madurai is only 164 km., which is one of the biggest cities in Tamilnadu and has excellent medical facilities having Apollo Hospitals, Meenakshi Mission Hospital and Vadamalayan Hospitals, where surgical oncology, chemotherapy and radiation therapy etc. are available. It has also been indicated that so far as the air transport facilities near Pazhayakayal is concerned, there is a domestic airport at Tuticorin, which is only 13 km. away from Pazhayakayal. The State capital of Kerala - Thiruvananthapuram is 198 kms. away from Pazhayakal and having several multi speciality hospitals. Besides the above, Chennai is at 620 km. from Pazhayakayal, which is a leading centre for cancer treatment and research and as such, the plea raised by the petitioner based on availability of treatment of his mother only at Chandigarh is baseless. It was indicated that in fact the petitioner prior to the date of transfer the petitioner did not avail any leave for the purpose of looking after his mother and/or travelling with her for treatment to Chandigarh etc. It w